| Plugin Name | Responsive Addons for Elementor |
|---|---|
| Type of Vulnerability | Authenticated Stored XSS |
| CVE Number | CVE-2025-8215 |
| Urgency | Low |
| CVE Publish Date | 2025-09-11 |
| Source URL | CVE-2025-8215 |
Responsive Addons for Elementor (≤1.7.4) — Authenticated Contributor Stored XSS (CVE-2025-8215): Analysis, Risks, and Practical Mitigations
Author: Hong Kong Security Expert
Date: 2025-09-11
Executive summary
A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability (CVE-2025-8215) has been disclosed in the WordPress plugin “Responsive Addons for Elementor” affecting versions up to and including 1.7.4. The vulnerability has an estimated CVSS-equivalent score of 6.5. An authenticated user with Contributor privileges (or higher) can inject JavaScript into widget configuration fields that are stored and later rendered in frontend pages or admin screens, enabling execution in the context of administrators or site visitors.
This advisory, written from the perspective of a Hong Kong security practitioner, covers:
- How the vulnerability operates;
- Realistic attack scenarios and impact;
- Detection techniques and indicators of compromise;
- Immediate, practical mitigations for site owners and administrators (no vendor promotions);
- Developer guidance for a correct fix.
Vulnerability overview
- Title: Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via multiple widgets
- Affected plugin: Responsive Addons for Elementor
- Affected versions: ≤ 1.7.4
- Attack vector: Stored XSS in widget settings / widget output
- Required privilege: Contributor or higher (authenticated)
- CVE: CVE-2025-8215
- Reported: 2025-09-11
- Official patch: Not available at time of disclosure
Stored XSS occurs when user-submitted input is stored by the server and later rendered without proper escaping or sanitization. In this case, widget settings are saved to the database and output on frontend or admin pages without adequate escaping, allowing an authenticated contributor to persist script payloads.
Why Contributor privilege matters
Contributors can create and edit content while authenticated. If contributors can interact with page builders or widgets, they may be able to save settings that include executable markup. Many sites use external contributors or guest authors; assuming all contributors are fully trusted is risky.
Realistic attack scenarios
-
Admin account takeover:
A contributor injects a payload into widget settings shown in the admin preview or widgets screen. When an administrator views the page, the payload executes and can steal session tokens or perform actions via authenticated AJAX, possibly creating an admin user.
-
Defacement, redirection, or malware delivery:
Frontend payloads can redirect visitors, inject ads, or load malicious scripts such as cryptominers.
-
Targeted phishing:
Widgets can be crafted to display fake admin notices or login prompts to capture credentials from administrators.
-
Supply-chain / propagation:
If the site serves widgets or content that other sites embed, the impact can extend beyond a single origin.
Impact assessment
- Confidentiality: High when admin sessions are targeted.
- Integrity: Moderate to high — attackers can alter content or settings.
- Availability: Low to moderate — redirects or heavy scripts can degrade service.
- Reachability: Varies — admin-only renderings limit public impact but still enable high-value attacks.
Indicators of compromise and detection
Prioritise detection if you run the affected plugin. The following checks help identify stored payloads and related activity.
Database searches
Search for suspicious script tags in postmeta and options. Run queries on a read replica or a safe copy.
# WP-CLI: search postmeta for script tags
wp db query "SELECT post_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_value LIKE '%';
Use wp_kses for controlled HTML
If HTML is allowed, maintain an explicit allowlist and disallow script/style tags and on* attributes.
Audit widget rendering contexts
Do not output saved HTML in admin previews. Use escaped previews or strip tags in admin contexts.
Automated tests
Add unit and integration tests that ensure inputs with script-like content are sanitized and outputs are escaped.
Suggested WAF rule logic (for security teams)
If you manage a WAF or create virtual patch rules, consider the following heuristics. Test rules in staging to avoid false positives.