Hong Kong Security Notice Donation SQL Injection(CVE202513001)

SQL Injection in WordPress Donation Plugin






SQL Injection in the Donation Plugin (<= 1.0) — Risk, Detection, and Mitigation


插件名称 WordPress Donation Plugin
漏洞类型 SQL Injection
CVE 编号 CVE-2025-13001
紧急程度
CVE 发布日期 2025-12-11
来源网址 CVE-2025-13001

SQL Injection in the Donation Plugin (≤ 1.0) — Risk, Detection, and Mitigation

Author: Hong Kong Security Research Team — Date: 2025-12-11

执行摘要

A SQL injection vulnerability has been disclosed in the WordPress “Donation” plugin (versions ≤ 1.0) and is tracked as CVE-2025-13001. The flaw is an authenticated SQL injection reachable from administrative functionality. Although exploitation requires administrative privileges, the consequences can be severe if an attacker gains admin credentials or a malicious administrator abuses their access. A practical impact rating for this vulnerability is high for data integrity and confidentiality.

This document, written from a Hong Kong security practitioner perspective, explains the risk profile, who is affected, how to detect possible exploitation, immediate mitigations you can apply today, secure coding fixes for developers, generic WAF rule patterns to reduce risk, and incident response steps for recovery.

目录

  • Overview and risk summary
  • Technical background (what SQL injection means here)
  • Impact analysis — what an attacker can do
  • 谁面临风险
  • Detection: how to know if you’re affected or exploited
  • Immediate mitigations (site owner steps)
  • Developer remediation guidance (secure coding)
  • Generic WAF rules and signatures (practical examples)
  • Incident response and recovery checklist
  • Hardening your WordPress admin posture
  • Weekly operational guidance and monitoring
  • 结论

Overview and risk summary

  • Affected software: Donation plugin for WordPress, versions ≤ 1.0.
  • Vulnerability class: Authenticated SQL Injection (admin-level).
  • Identifier: CVE-2025-13001.
  • Severity: High potential impact for database confidentiality and integrity; practical exploitation requires admin access.
  • Official patch status: At disclosure, no vendor patch was available. If a vendor patch appears, prioritize installation.

Why this matters: SQL injection allows crafted input to change the semantics of database queries. Even when limited to administrative contexts, the result may include data exfiltration, privilege escalation, database modification, persistent backdoors, or complete site takeover.

Technical background — what exactly is an SQL injection in this context?

SQL injection occurs when user-supplied input is embedded into a database query without proper sanitization or parameterization. Commonly, vulnerable WordPress plugins build SQL strings using unchecked variables from requests (POST/GET/AJAX) and execute them using $wpdb functions.

In this disclosure:

  • The vulnerable code path is reachable by authenticated administrators (plugin settings, donation management pages, or admin AJAX endpoints).
  • Input from the admin interface or an AJAX call is used directly in a SQL query without preparation.
  • An attacker with admin credentials (or a malicious admin) can craft input that modifies the executed SQL.

Because the vulnerability is tied to admin functionality, anonymous remote exploitation is not the primary risk vector — however, admin accounts are frequently targeted via phishing, credential reuse, or session theft, making this a serious concern.

Impact analysis — what an attacker could achieve

If exploited, an authenticated SQL injection can enable an attacker to:

  • Extract sensitive data from the database (user data, emails, hashed passwords, API keys, plugin settings).
  • Modify tables and records (change roles, create admin users, alter site options).
  • Persist backdoors or inject malicious content via database-driven options or posts.
  • Leak credentials used by the site to access external services and pivot to other systems.
  • Cause denial-of-service with expensive or malformed queries.
  • Potentially achieve full site compromise if an attacker creates an admin account or modifies critical settings.

In short: an administrative SQLi is high-risk despite the authentication requirement, because gaining admin access is a common attacker objective.

谁面临风险?

  • Sites running the Donation plugin at version 1.0 or earlier.
  • Sites with multiple or shared admin accounts, weak admin passwords, or no 2FA.
  • Installations exposing admin endpoints publicly without additional access controls (IP restrictions, VPN).
  • Sites without a WAF, strong monitoring, or reliable backups.

Operators managing multiple clients should assume credential reuse risk: a breach at one site can compromise other systems.

Detection — how to check if you are affected or exploited

  1. Inventory your plugins

    • From WP Admin > Plugins, check whether “Donation” is installed and the version. If it is 1.0 or less, treat the site as vulnerable.
    • Use your management dashboard or inventory tooling to list plugin versions across any fleet of sites you manage.
  2. Look for suspicious admin activity

    • Review audit logs (if enabled) for unexpected admin logins, new admin accounts, or file modifications.
    • Check web server access logs for POST requests to wp-admin or admin-ajax.php from unusual IPs or with unusual parameters.
  3. Inspect database activity

    • Examine database logs (slow query/general logs) for queries containing UNION, INFORMATION_SCHEMA, or other SQL meta-operators.
    • Check wp_options and wp_users for unexpected entries or timestamp changes.
  4. Scan for webshells and backdoors

    • Run a trusted malware scanner and perform file integrity checks (compare current files with known clean copies).
  5. Signs of compromise to watch for

    • New or renamed admin users, unexpected changes to site URLs, unfamiliar scheduled tasks, or unexplained outbound connections.

If indicators are present, treat the site as compromised and follow an incident response process.

Immediate mitigation steps (what to do right now)

The following actions are prioritized to reduce exposure quickly.

  1. Isolate and contain

    • Temporarily deactivate the Donation plugin from WP admin if possible.
    • If WP admin is not accessible, disable the plugin by renaming its folder via SFTP or hosting control panel (e.g., wp-content/plugins/donation → wp-content/plugins/donation.disabled).
  2. Lock down admin access

    • Enforce strong passwords and reset passwords for all admin accounts immediately.
    • Enable two-factor authentication (2FA) for admin accounts.
    • Restrict access to /wp-admin and admin-ajax.php by IP allowlisting or require VPN access when possible.
  3. Rotate secrets and credentials

    • Rotate database credentials if you suspect database-level access or find suspicious queries.
    • Rotate API keys and any service credentials stored in plugin settings or wp_options.
  4. Restore from known-good backup if compromise suspected

    • Restore from a backup taken before the suspected intrusion. Before re-enabling access, ensure admin credentials are rotated and protections are in place.
  5. 扫描和监控

    • Run full malware scans and file integrity checks. Enable or review server and application logs (web server, DB, PHP).
  6. Consider removal

    • If the plugin is not essential, remove it until a vendor patch is available. Use temporary alternatives (third-party donation platforms or embeddable forms) where appropriate.
  7. Prevent re-infection

    • Remove unfamiliar scheduled tasks, unauthorized admin users, unknown plugins/themes, and suspicious files in uploads or mu-plugins folders.

Developer remediation guidance — fixing SQL injection properly

Developers responsible for the Donation plugin should implement the following secure-coding practices:

  • Parameterize queries using $wpdb->prepare instead of concatenating variables into SQL strings.
  • Prefer the higher-level API functions: $wpdb->insert, $wpdb->update, $wpdb->delete.
  • Validate and sanitize inputs: cast integers with intval(), use sanitize_text_field(), sanitize_email(), and use nonces via wp_verify_nonce() for admin AJAX endpoints.
  • Always check capabilities (e.g., current_user_can('manage_options')) for admin actions.
  • Escape output when rendering to HTML with esc_html(), esc_attr(), 等等。.
  • Introduce unit tests that attempt to inject SQL to validate protections and run static analysis tools to find unsafe patterns.

Unsafe example (do not use)

// Unsafe: concatenates user input directly into SQL
$id = $_POST['donation_id'];
$sql = "SELECT * FROM {$wpdb->prefix}donations WHERE id = $id";
$results = $wpdb->get_results($sql);

Safe alternatives

// Using $wpdb->prepare
$id = intval($_POST['donation_id']);
$sql = $wpdb->prepare(
    "SELECT * FROM {$wpdb->prefix}donations WHERE id = %d",
    $id
);
$results = $wpdb->get_results($sql);
// Using $wpdb->insert
$insert = $wpdb->insert(
    "{$wpdb->prefix}donations",
    array(
        'amount' => floatval($_POST['amount']),
        'payer_email' => sanitize_email($_POST['email'])
    ),
    array('%f','%s')
);

Generic WAF rules and signatures (practical and safe)

While awaiting an official vendor patch, a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or other request-filtering mechanism can provide temporary mitigation. Below are safe, generic rule patterns that focus on common attack techniques without exposing exploit payloads.

  1. Block SQL meta-operators in admin endpoints

    • Target: Requests to /wp-admin/*admin-ajax.php.
    • Rule logic: If a parameter contains case-insensitive patterns like UNION SELECT, INFORMATION_SCHEMA, SLEEP(, BENCHMARK(, or comment sequences (–) and the request is from an untrusted IP, block the request.
  2. Enforce type constraints on parameters

    • If a parameter is expected to be numeric (e.g., donation_id), reject values with non-digit characters.
  3. Block tautology and boolean-based payloads

    • If a parameter contains expressions like 1=1 or similar tautologies and the session is untrusted, block and log the attempt.
  4. Rate-limit admin AJAX usage

    • Apply rate limits to admin AJAX actions that modify the database. Spike detection on POSTs to admin-ajax.php should trigger alerts.
  5. Restrict sensitive admin pages

    • Create tighter rules for specific plugin admin URIs (e.g., donation edit pages) to inspect parameters for suspicious tokens.

Note: Avoid overly broad regexes which may cause false positives and disrupt legitimate admin workflows. Test rules in a staging environment before applying to production.

Incident response and recovery checklist

  1. Take the site offline (maintenance mode) or restrict access to known admin IPs.
  2. Change passwords for all admin users and require 2FA on re-entry.
  3. Rotate keys and secrets stored in the database or files (API keys, payment gateway credentials).
  4. Snapshot the server and database for forensic analysis before making changes.
  5. Restore a clean backup only after securing admin access and confirming the backup is uncompromised.
  6. Re-scan the restored site for backdoors and confirm integrity.
  7. Review access logs to determine the window and scope of compromise and identify exfiltrated data.
  8. Notify stakeholders and comply with any applicable legal or regulatory breach notification requirements.
  9. Apply long-term fixes: install official plugin updates, deploy secure code changes, and enable continuous monitoring.

Record each step of the investigation and recovery process to support audits and possible future legal needs.

Hardening your WordPress admin posture (best practices)

  • Limit administrator accounts: grant the least privilege (use Editor/Author roles where appropriate).
  • Use unique admin usernames and strong passwords; encourage password managers.
  • Enforce two-factor authentication for all admin users.
  • Restrict admin access by IP or require VPN access for sensitive admin operations.
  • Monitor and alert on new admin users, role changes, and repeated failed login attempts.
  • Remove unused plugins and themes and keep active components patched.
  • Keep off-site backups and verify restore procedures regularly.

Weekly operational guidance and monitoring

  • Schedule weekly security scans of plugins and themes and review alerts from monitoring systems.
  • Maintain a prioritized patching schedule for high-risk plugins that interact with payments, user data, or the database.
  • Monitor public vulnerability feeds and vendor advisories for newly released fixes.
  • If managing multiple sites, use centralized dashboards and automated inventory checks to maintain visibility.

常见问题解答

Q: If the vulnerability requires admin access, is it really a problem?

A: Yes. Admin accounts are a high-value target and are often compromised through phishing, credential reuse, or stolen sessions. Treat admin-only vulnerabilities seriously because they enable powerful post-compromise actions.

Q: Should I immediately remove the Donation plugin?

A: If the plugin is non-essential and cannot be patched promptly, removing or disabling it is the safest short-term action. If functionality is required, isolate admin access, enforce 2FA, and apply the mitigations described above until a vendor patch is available.

Q: Will a WAF always block exploitation even when an admin is logged in?

A: A properly configured WAF can block common SQLi payload patterns while minimizing interference with legitimate admin actions. However, WAFs are not a substitute for secure coding; they provide time-limited mitigation and monitoring while code fixes are developed and deployed.

Final recommendations — what to do next

  1. Assume any site running the Donation plugin (≤ 1.0) is vulnerable until proven otherwise.
  2. Immediately apply containment: disable the plugin, rotate admin credentials, and enable 2FA for all admin users.
  3. Deploy short-term mitigations such as request filtering (WAF), parameter validation, and rate limiting on admin endpoints.
  4. Developers and vendors: issue a secure patch that parameterizes queries, sanitizes inputs, and validates capabilities; publish release notes and migration guidance.
  5. Maintain strong monitoring, logging, and off-site, tested backups; investigate logs for signs of past exploitation.
  6. If you require help, engage a qualified security consultant, your hosting provider’s security team, or an incident response specialist to assist with investigation and remediation.

About the authors

Prepared by a Hong Kong-based security research and incident response group with practical experience defending WordPress sites in APAC environments. Our approach emphasises pragmatic containment, secure coding, and forensic discipline.

Disclaimer: This advisory provides guidance for immediate mitigation and recovery. It does not replace a full forensic investigation where compromise is suspected. Always preserve evidence (logs, snapshots) before making changes that could affect an investigation.


0 分享:
你可能也喜欢