Plugin Name | Quiz And Survey Master |
---|---|
Type of Vulnerability | CSRF |
CVE Number | CVE-2025-6790 |
Urgency | Low |
CVE Publish Date | 2025-08-14 |
Source URL | CVE-2025-6790 |
QSM (< 10.2.3) — “Template Creation via CSRF” (CVE-2025-6790): What Hong Kong Site Owners and Developers Need to Know
This advisory summarises a Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) issue affecting the Quiz and Survey Master (QSM) plugin (CVE-2025-6790), fixed in version 10.2.3. The flaw permits template creation via a CSRF vector. Though rated low (CVSS 4.3), the practical impact can be meaningful on sites where high‑privilege users can be induced to visit attacker pages. Below we provide a clear technical explanation, realistic exploitation scenarios, detection guidance, mitigations you can apply immediately, and development hardening recommendations. This guidance reflects practical experience securing WordPress sites in Hong Kong and the region: concise, actionable, and focused on rapid risk reduction.
Executive summary
- What: CSRF vulnerability in QSM < 10.2.3 that allows creation of plugin templates without proper server‑side checks.
- Affected versions: QSM (Quiz And Survey Master) prior to 10.2.3.
- Fixed in: 10.2.3.
- CVE: CVE-2025-6790.
- Severity: Low (CVSS 4.3), but exploitation may produce persistent content that can be abused for phishing, SEO spam, or social engineering.
- Immediate action: Apply the patch (10.2.3+) as the first measure. If you cannot update immediately, apply compensating controls described below.
What is CSRF and why it matters for WordPress
Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) causes an authenticated user’s browser to perform actions on a site without their intent. For WordPress, this targets admin or authenticated AJAX endpoints. An attacker hosts a page or email that submits a crafted request; the victim’s browser includes their session cookies and the site executes the action unless server‑side protections are in place.
Primary server‑side defenses are:
- Nonce verification (action‑specific tokens),
- Capability checks to ensure the current user is authorised,
- Origin/Referer validation where appropriate, and
- Robust server‑side authorisation logic.
The QSM issue allowed template creation without sufficient CSRF protection or capability validation, enabling the attack chain described below.
Why this QSM vulnerability is notable (practical impact)
Although classified as low severity, the real‑world risk depends on user privileges and site configuration:
- If an administrator or other high‑privilege user visits a malicious page, the attacker can create templates stored by the plugin. Those templates may later host malicious content for phishing or link insertion for SEO abuse.
- If templates are rendered without proper sanitisation, stored XSS or content injection becomes possible. Even benign‑appearing templates can be weaponised for social engineering or to confuse site operators.
- Automated scanning and mass exploitation are common after disclosure. Sites that delay patching are at increased risk of opportunistic attacks.
Because the attack can be performed silently when an admin is logged in, prompt action and compensating controls are warranted.
How an attacker might exploit this (high level)
- Attacker crafts an HTML form or script that issues a POST to QSM’s template creation endpoint (admin or AJAX handler).
- Victim (an authenticated admin or privileged user) is enticed to visit the malicious page via phishing, ads, or social engineering.
- The victim’s browser sends the authenticated request; without a valid nonce or capability checks the server creates a template record.
- The attacker now has a persistent asset on the site (a template) they can use for later abuse.
This flow demonstrates why server‑side nonces and capability checks are essential.
Detection: what to look for
If you run QSM, check the following immediately:
- Inventory — Confirm plugin version. If < 10.2.3, prioritise update.
- Admin inspection — Log into wp-admin and review plugin templates/folders for unexpected entries, odd names, or unknown authorship.
- Access logs — Search logs for POSTs to admin-ajax.php or admin-post.php with QSM action parameters or unusual referrers. Look for POSTs at times when no admin action occurred.
- Database — Search for recent entries in plugin tables or post types QSM uses; check creation timestamps.
- Filesystem — Check for new files in writable directories or suspicious uploads.
- User activity — Verify admin login times and IPs. Ensure no unauthorized accounts exist.
- Malware scans — Run scans and manual reviews; attackers sometimes obfuscate backdoors so use multiple techniques.
If you find suspicious artefacts, treat the site as potentially compromised and follow recovery steps below.
Immediate mitigation steps (if you cannot update right away)
Applying the official update is the best action. If you must delay the update due to testing or compatibility checks, use these compensating controls:
- Block suspicious POSTs: Implement web server or application rules to block POST requests to endpoints associated with template creation when requests lack valid nonces or expected origin headers.
- Harden admin area: Restrict access to /wp-admin/ and admin AJAX to known IPs where feasible; require admins to use separate accounts for management and to avoid browsing untrusted sites while logged in.
- Temporarily disable the plugin: If QSM is non‑critical, consider deactivating it until you can safely update.
- Block external POSTs at server level: Reject POSTs to admin endpoints originating from external domains or missing origin/referrer headers (understanding these headers can be absent legitimately in some cases).
- Increase monitoring: Turn on detailed logging and watch for creation of new templates or configuration changes.
These measures reduce exposure while you complete testing and apply the official patch.
Recommended permanent fixes for plugin developers
Developers should ensure server‑side protections on every state‑changing endpoint:
- Nonce verification — Use WordPress nonces for all state changes. Example handling:
if ( ! isset( $_POST['qsm_nonce'] ) || ! wp_verify_nonce( sanitize_text_field( wp_unslash( $_POST['qsm_nonce'] ) ), 'qsm_create_template' ) ) { wp_send_json_error( array( 'message' => 'Invalid request' ), 400 ); }
- Capability checks — Verify current_user_can with the least privilege needed:
if ( ! current_user_can( 'manage_options' ) ) { wp_send_json_error( array( 'message' => 'Insufficient privileges' ), 403 ); }
- Sanitise and escape — Sanitize inputs before storing and escape outputs when rendering templates.
- REST API permission callbacks — When using the REST API, implement permission callbacks that check capabilities and nonce/token validity.
- Safe file and DB writes — Avoid allowing arbitrary content to be interpreted as executable code; restrict writable directories.
- Logging and rate limiting — Log sensitive actions and consider rate limits for state‑changing endpoints.
Applying these controls prevents CSRF and reduces the risk of privilege misuse.
Recovery after suspected exploitation
- Isolate — Place the site in maintenance mode or take it offline while you investigate.
- Preserve evidence — Collect logs, database exports and filesystem snapshots for analysis.
- Revoke and rotate credentials — Force password resets for admin users and review accounts for unauthorised additions.
- Remove malicious content — Remove suspicious templates, posts or files after taking snapshots for forensics.
- Full malware scan and manual review — Inspect theme and plugin PHP files, uploads and wp-config.php for unauthorised changes.
- Restore from a known good backup — If you cannot confidently clean the site, restore and then apply patches and hardening.
- Apply the patch — Update QSM to 10.2.3+ and verify nonce and capability checks are present.
- Post‑incident monitoring — Monitor logs and alerts for several weeks following recovery.
- External notifications — If customer data is affected, follow applicable legal and compliance notification requirements.
If you lack internal incident response expertise, consider engaging a professional incident response provider experienced with WordPress for a thorough cleanup.
How to verify the plugin is patched and safe
- Confirm plugin version in WP Admin shows 10.2.3 or later.
- Review update notes for references to CSRF or template creation fixes.
- Test in a staging environment to verify template creation flows now require nonces and capability checks.
- Optionally inspect the plugin handler code to ensure calls to wp_verify_nonce and current_user_can are present.
- Monitor access logs for anomalous POST activity for several days after patching.
Proactive security best practices for WordPress sites
- Keep WordPress core, themes and plugins updated; apply critical updates promptly.
- Minimise active plugins; remove unused plugins and themes.
- Use role separation: dedicate admin accounts for site administration and avoid browsing untrusted pages while logged in.
- Enforce strong passwords and two‑factor authentication for all admin accounts.
- Limit access to wp-admin and wp-login.php from known IP ranges where practical.
- Schedule regular backups and test restores.
- Maintain detailed logging and audit trails for user actions and plugin changes.
- Perform periodic security audits and code reviews for plugins you develop or customise.
Why WAF & virtual patching can help (practical explanation)
A web application firewall (WAF) can provide an interim safety net:
- Detects and blocks attempts to trigger vulnerable endpoints before they reach the application.
- Virtual patching (custom rules) reduces the exposure window between disclosure and the time you can apply a tested update.
- WAFs can enforce additional checks such as stricter Origin/Referer validation or reputation‑based IP blocking.
For organisations managing many sites or high‑value properties, virtual patching is a practical way to reduce risk while following normal QA and deployment processes.
Checklist: Step‑by‑step for site owners (urgent actions)
- Check QSM version; if < 10.2.3 plan an immediate update.
- If possible, update now: apply 10.2.3+, test functionality, and monitor logs.
- If you cannot update immediately:
- Implement server/web rules to block template creation requests lacking valid nonces or expected referers.
- Limit admin access with IP allowlists and ask admins to log out and re-login only from trusted networks.
- Increase monitoring and scan for suspicious changes.
- Audit plugin templates and entries for unexpected items.
- Ensure backups are available and verified.
- After updating, verify nonce/capability protections are present in the plugin code.
- Educate administrators: avoid browsing unknown pages while logged into admin accounts.
For developers: secure handler checklist (short)
- Use wp_verify_nonce and wp_create_nonce for every state‑changing action.
- Use current_user_can with the least necessary capability.
- Sanitise and validate all inputs; escape outputs when rendering content.
- Implement permission callbacks for REST endpoints.
- Log sensitive actions for audit purposes.
Closing notes — prioritise, but stay level‑headed
This QSM CSRF vulnerability is rated low and in many environments will not lead to severe compromise. Still, attackers scan and act quickly — treat CSRF weaknesses that allow state changes seriously. Update plugins promptly; when updates must be delayed, apply compensating controls (server rules, admin restrictions, monitoring) to reduce risk. Combine solid development practices (nonces, capability checks) with operational hygiene (backups, role separation, logging) to keep WordPress sites resilient.
If you need assistance designing mitigations, testing updates, or running incident response, engage a qualified WordPress security professional with experience in forensic cleanup and recovery.
Action now: Confirm QSM is updated to 10.2.3+ on all sites you manage and review admin templates for unexpected entries.