Plugin Name | WP Filter & Combine RSS Feeds |
---|---|
Type of Vulnerability | Missing Authorization |
CVE Number | CVE-2025-7828 |
Urgency | Low |
CVE Publish Date | 2025-08-22 |
Source URL | CVE-2025-7828 |
Security Advisory: WP Filter & Combine RSS Feeds (<= 0.4) — Missing Authorization Allows Authenticated Contributor Feed Deletion (CVE-2025-7828)
Date: 22 August 2025 — Severity: Low (CVSS 4.3) — Fixed version: N/A (no official fix at time of disclosure)
As a Hong Kong security expert monitoring WordPress ecosystem disclosures, I summarise the issue, impact, detection signals and practical mitigations you can apply immediately. This advisory avoids exploit details and focuses on defensive actions.
Executive summary
- Vulnerability: Missing authorization checks allow authenticated users with the Contributor role to request feed deletion actions intended for administrators.
- Likelihood: Low — attacker needs a Contributor account on the site.
- Impact: Low-to-moderate — configured feeds can be deleted, breaking content aggregation and related functionality.
- Immediate mitigations: Deactivate the plugin, restrict Contributor accounts, apply virtual patches at the firewall layer, monitor logs and restore from backups if needed.
- Long-term: Ensure server-side capability and nonce checks in plugin code and enforce least-privilege access for users.
What exactly is wrong?
The plugin exposes a feed-deletion action without proper capability checks (for example, manage_options) and/or nonce verification. Consequently, any authenticated account with Contributor privileges can trigger the deletion routine and remove one or more configured RSS feeds from the plugin settings.
Key points:
- The attack requires authentication; anonymous users cannot exploit it directly.
- A Contributor account is sufficient; many sites grant this role to guest authors or external collaborators.
- No official patch is available at disclosure time; site owners must act defensively.
Why the risk is scored “Low” — and why you should still act
The CVSS score reflects that exploitation requires a pre-existing Contributor account and that the immediate impact is limited to configuration changes. Nevertheless:
- Feed deletion can break public-facing features (aggregated pages, cron jobs, syndicated content).
- If contributor accounts can be created or compromised, the vulnerability becomes more valuable.
- Broken access control is often a first step in chained attacks; remediation reduces overall risk.
Prompt remediation is warranted even for low-severity access-control issues.
Who is affected?
- Sites running WP Filter & Combine RSS Feeds plugin at versions ≤ 0.4.
- Sites that grant Contributor-level permissions to untrusted users.
- Sites without monitoring for plugin configuration changes.
How an attacker could misuse this (high level, non-exploitative)
An attacker with a Contributor account could invoke the plugin’s feed-deletion endpoint (for example via admin-ajax, admin-post, or a REST route) and pass parameters identifying which feed to delete. Effects include missing aggregated content, failed imports, and disrupted editorial workflows. This advisory does not provide proof-of-concept code or step-by-step exploit guidance.
Immediate mitigations (priority order)
- Deactivate the plugin — If you can tolerate losing its functionality temporarily, remove or deactivate the plugin to eliminate the vulnerable code path.
- Restrict Contributor accounts — Remove or downgrade guest Contributor accounts and audit user inventory for unknown or inactive users with elevated privileges.
- Harden registration and authentication — Disable open registration where possible; enforce strong passwords and multi-factor authentication for Contributor+ roles.
- Adjust role mappings — Ensure only administrators can manage plugin settings by constraining capabilities via a role editor or equivalent control.
- Virtual patch / WAF rules — Deploy conservative firewall rules that block feed-deletion requests originating from non-admin sessions or lacking valid nonces.
- Monitor and alert — Enable logging for admin requests and configuration changes; alert on admin-ajax/admin-post and REST deletion attempts from non-admin accounts.
- Back up plugin settings — Export plugin configuration and take a full site backup now to allow restoration if feeds are removed.
Recommended detection signals (what to look for in logs)
- POST requests to admin-ajax.php or admin-post.php containing parameters like feed_id, action, delete_feed, delete_rss_feed, etc.
- REST API calls to /wp-json/<plugin-namespace>/ with DELETE semantics against feed resources.
- Requests from Contributor accounts resulting in changes to plugin options or database entries storing feed data.
- Unexpected deletion of feed entries in wp_options or plugin-specific tables.
- Audit logs showing non-admin users changing settings.
If you use a web application firewall or logging solution, enable admin-request logging and create alerts for admin-ajax/admin-post actions by accounts without administrator capability.
Safe code-level remediation (for plugin authors or site maintainers)
If you can modify the plugin code, add capability checks and nonce verification to the feed deletion handler. Below is a high-level example — replace function and parameter names with those used by the plugin. Do not deploy untested code to production.
<?php
// Example safe handler for feed deletion
function wpfcr_delete_feed_handler() {
// Require user to be logged in
if ( ! is_user_logged_in() ) {
wp_send_json_error( 'Authentication required', 403 );
exit;
}
// Capability check — only allow administrators / site managers
if ( ! current_user_can( 'manage_options' ) ) {
wp_send_json_error( 'Insufficient permission', 403 );
exit;
}
// Verify nonce (replace 'wpfcr_delete_nonce' with plugin's nonce name)
if ( ! isset( $_POST['wpfcr_nonce'] ) || ! wp_verify_nonce( $_POST['wpfcr_nonce'], 'wpfcr_delete_feed' ) ) {
wp_send_json_error( 'Invalid request', 400 );
exit;
}
// Sanitize feed ID and perform deletion safely
$feed_id = isset( $_POST['feed_id'] ) ? intval( $_POST['feed_id'] ) : 0;
if ( $feed_id <= 0 ) {
wp_send_json_error( 'Invalid feed id', 400 );
exit;
}
// Delete logic: use prepared calls and WordPress APIs
// Example: remove from wp_options or custom table depending on plugin
$deleted = wpfcr_delete_feed_by_id( $feed_id );
if ( $deleted ) {
wp_send_json_success( 'Feed deleted' );
} else {
wp_send_json_error( 'Could not delete feed', 500 );
}
exit;
}
?>
For AJAX/admin_post hooks, ensure both current_user_can() and wp_verify_nonce() checks are present. For REST routes, use a permission_callback enforcing admin-level capability.
Recommended virtual patch / WAF rules
While waiting for a plugin fix, conservative WAF rules can block hazardous requests. Replace parameter names and action values with those actually used by the plugin after inspection. Test rules in staging before production.
-
Block POSTs to admin endpoints that attempt feed deletion without a valid nonce
Logic (human-readable): If METHOD == POST and URI contains admin-ajax.php or admin-post.php and request body contains feed_id (or similar) and action indicates deletion and no nonce parameter present, then block and log (HTTP 403).
-
Require administrator session or block non-admin attempts
If request targets known plugin admin pages and is a POST, require the session user role to be administrator; otherwise block or challenge.
-
Rate-limit contributor requests to admin endpoints
Throttle contributor-role requests to admin-ajax/admin-post endpoints if they exceed a small threshold within a short window.
-
Block REST DELETE calls from non-admin sessions
Require DELETE on plugin REST endpoints to be issued only by users with admin-level capabilities.
Note: A WAF cannot always validate WordPress nonces reliably. Prefer rules that block requests missing nonce parameters entirely or that originate from non-admin sessions. If your WAF supports session/role awareness, map logged-in sessions to roles and use that to enforce admin-only actions.
How to audit whether you’ve been impacted
- Inspect plugin settings — verify that configured feeds are present and correct.
- Check activity logs — look for admin-ajax/admin-post calls and option changes tied to feed settings.
- Database checks — compare current wp_options (or plugin tables) with backups to detect deletions.
- Backup comparison — restore or compare backups taken before the disclosure date.
- Server logs — inspect webserver access logs for relevant POST requests.
Incident response checklist
- Export current configuration and take a full site backup immediately.
- Deactivate the plugin until virtual patches or code fixes are applied.
- Rotate passwords and force logout for non-admin users if account compromise is suspected.
- Restore missing feeds from backups or reconfigure manually.
- Remove any untrusted Contributor accounts and investigate their origin.
- Preserve forensic copies of logs and backups for analysis.
- Notify stakeholders (editors, site owners) of impact and remediation steps.
Secure development recommendations for plugin authors
- Fail closed: deny actions by default and explicitly allow only known-capability holders.
- Use capability checks: current_user_can() with admin-level capabilities or a plugin-specific admin-only capability.
- Verify nonces: use wp_nonce_field() on admin forms and wp_verify_nonce() in handlers.
- Avoid assumptions about roles: always check capabilities at the server side.
- Sanitise and validate inputs: use intval(), sanitize_text_field(), esc_attr(), etc.
- For REST endpoints, implement permission_callback enforcing capability checks.
- Log sensitive actions with user ID, timestamp, IP and parameters.
- Include unit tests for capability checks as part of CI and release process.
Example hardening for REST endpoints
<?php
register_rest_route(
'wpfcr/v1',
'/feeds/(?P<id>\d+)',
array(
'methods' => 'DELETE',
'callback' => 'wpfcr_rest_delete_feed',
'permission_callback' => function() {
return current_user_can( 'manage_options' );
},
)
);
?>
This ensures DELETE requests are permitted only for users with manage_options
capability.
Why virtual patching at the WAF is a good temporary measure
Virtual patching via a firewall is fast, non-destructive when scoped conservatively, provides defence-in-depth, and gives visibility into attempted exploitation. Use it as a temporary control while awaiting a code fix.
Practical checklist for site owners (step-by-step)
- Identify — confirm plugin is installed and version ≤ 0.4.
- Backup — take a full site backup (files + database).
- Deactivate plugin — if feasible, to remove the vulnerable code path.
- Audit users — remove unknown contributors; enforce password resets for contributors.
- Deploy WAF rule — block feed deletion actions from non-admins or missing nonce flows.
- Monitor logs — focus on admin-ajax/admin-post REST calls and option changes.
- Restore feeds — from backup if necessary.
- Plan update — apply plugin author patch when available and test before deployment.
- Post-mortem — document incident and implement process improvements.
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
- Can an anonymous attacker exploit this?
- No. Exploitation requires an authenticated account with at least Contributor privileges.
- Is site takeover possible using this bug alone?
- Not directly. The immediate impact is configuration changes (feed deletion). However, broken access control can be chained with other weaknesses.
- How quickly should I act?
- Act immediately: deactivate the plugin or apply virtual patches and audit accounts.
- What if I depend on this plugin for core site functionality?
- Restrict who can manage plugin settings to administrators, deploy conservative firewall rules, and plan to implement a code-level fix or replace the plugin with a maintained alternative.
Long-term remediation & process improvements
- Maintain an inventory of installed plugins and versions.
- Subscribe to vulnerability feeds for critical plugins.
- Have an incident playbook for plugin vulnerabilities (backup, virtual patching, user audit, vendor follow-up).
- Limit Contributor-level access where not strictly required.
- Enforce strong identity controls: 2FA, periodic access reviews and account verification for editorial teams.