Hong Kong Security Advisory UsersWP SQL Injection(CVE202510003)

WordPress UsersWP plugin
Plugin Name UsersWP
Type of Vulnerability SQL Injection
CVE Number CVE-2025-10003
Urgency High
CVE Publish Date 2025-09-06
Source URL CVE-2025-10003

UsersWP <= 1.2.44 — Authenticated (low-privilege) SQL Injection (CVE-2025-10003)

Author: Hong Kong Security Expert | Date: 2025-09-06

Summary: A high-severity SQL Injection vulnerability affects the UsersWP plugin up to version 1.2.44 and is fixed in 1.2.45 (CVE-2025-10003). Reports vary on whether authentication is required; assume a low-privilege authenticated account (subscriber) or even unauthenticated input may reach vulnerable SQL paths. Exploitation can expose or modify database contents, leading to data theft, privilege escalation, or full site compromise.


TL;DR — Immediate actions

  1. Update UsersWP to version 1.2.45 or later immediately — this is the definitive fix.
  2. If you cannot update right now:
    • Disable the UsersWP plugin temporarily.
    • Block or restrict access to UsersWP front-end endpoints and forms (rate-limit, require CAPTCHA or admin approval).
    • Prevent new registrations if your site allows public signups and closely monitor existing user activity.
  3. Audit logs and the database for suspicious queries, new admin users, or unexpected changes.
  4. Follow the incident response checklist below if you suspect compromise.

If you manage multiple WordPress sites or host client sites, treat every instance running UsersWP as at-risk until updated.

Vulnerability overview (technical, without exploit code)

  • Affected component: UsersWP WordPress plugin (front-end login/registration/profile/members directory).
  • Affected versions: <= 1.2.44
  • Fixed in: 1.2.45
  • CVE: CVE-2025-10003
  • Vulnerability class: SQL Injection (OWASP A1 / Injection)
  • Reported impact: High; CVSS 9.3 (high)
  • Attacker prerequisites: Many reports indicate a low-privilege authenticated user (subscriber). Given conflicting public reports, assume either unauthenticated or low-privilege auth may be sufficient — treat as severe.

What happened (high level)

The plugin accepted unsanitized or insufficiently parameterized input from front-end forms (login, registration, profile updates, or members directory filters). User input was concatenated into SQL queries instead of being passed into prepared statements, allowing crafted input to manipulate SQL logic and return or modify protected data.

Why this matters

WordPress sites often store e-mail addresses, hashed passwords, API tokens, eCommerce and custom data. An SQL injection that exposes arbitrary database fields enables attackers to enumerate, exfiltrate or alter data — leading to account takeover, data leakage and potential site-wide compromise.

Realistic attack scenarios

  • Data exfiltration: Read arbitrary columns (wp_users, wp_usermeta) to obtain emails, password hashes, tokens or private metadata.
  • Account takeover: Read password hashes for offline cracking or directly modify roles/create admin accounts via DB writes.
  • Lateral movement & persistence: Insert backdoors, malicious options, or schedule tasks; modify behavior through DB-triggered mechanisms.
  • Mass exploitation: UsersWP exposes common front-end endpoints, enabling automated scanners to enumerate and exploit vulnerable versions at scale.

Conflicting reports: authenticated vs unauthenticated

Public information is inconsistent. Some reports indicate a subscriber account is required; others list unauthenticated. Until confirmed for your environment, operate on the assumption that minimal or no authentication may be enough. Treat any input from low-privilege users as potentially dangerous.

Indicators of compromise (IoCs) and detection guidance

Early detection can limit impact. Look for:

  1. Unusual database queries or errors
    • Increase in slow queries, timeouts, or MySQL syntax errors.
    • Queries containing SQL keywords in parameters (UNION, SELECT, /**/ comments).
  2. Unexpected site behaviour
    • New admin users or elevated accounts you did not create.
    • Mass password reset emails or abnormal login attempts.
    • Strange content, options changes or unfamiliar plugin entries in admin.
  3. Web server logs
    • POST requests to UsersWP endpoints with suspicious payloads.
    • Parameters containing SQL keywords, unusual encodings or long payloads.
  4. File system anomalies
    • New PHP files in uploads, modified plugin/theme files, unexpected timestamps.
  5. Suspicious user activity
    • IP addresses performing many requests against profile/members endpoints; look for data center ranges, TOR exit nodes or unusual geolocation.

Where to check:

  • Web server access and error logs (nginx/apache).
  • WordPress debug log (if enabled) and plugin debug outputs.
  • Database general/slow query logs (if available).
  • Hosting logs and any perimeter logs you collect.

Immediate mitigation steps (prioritised)

  1. Update plugin to 1.2.45 or later — the patch

    This is the only guaranteed code fix. Update all instances immediately. Coordinate mass updates across multiple sites during a maintenance window if necessary.

  2. If you cannot update immediately, do one or more of:
    • Disable the UsersWP plugin until you can apply the patch.
    • Disable new user registration and restrict front-end forms (set registration to “closed” in Settings > General).
    • Require administrative approval for new accounts temporarily.
  3. Apply virtual patching (WAF) rules

    If you operate a web application firewall or reverse proxy, implement focused rules to block SQLi attempts against UsersWP form endpoints and parameters. See the pattern guidance below.

  4. Lock down accounts & rotate keys
    • Force-reset passwords for administrators and other privileged users.
    • Rotate API keys and database credentials if you suspect exfiltration.
    • Consider rotating WordPress salts (AUTH_SALT, etc.) if session tokens may be compromised.
  5. Monitor and investigate
    • Retain detailed logs of access and errors.
    • Search for exploitation indicators above and escalate if you find signs of compromise.

WAF / virtual patching recommendations (pattern guidance — safe, non-exploit)

When you cannot update across all environments, virtual patching at the edge can reduce risk. Keep rules narrow to avoid breaking legitimate traffic.

Key principles

  • Block requests containing SQL keywords or meta-characters in parameters where they should not appear.
  • Limit rules to UsersWP-specific endpoints and parameter names to reduce false positives.
  • Rate-limit front-end form submissions and registration endpoints.
  • Challenge suspicious traffic (CAPTCHA/bot-challenge) rather than outright blocking where appropriate.

Example rule logic (high-level)

Apply the following inspection patterns to UsersWP front-end endpoints (login, registration, profile, members directory):

  • Match request path for known UsersWP endpoints.
  • Inspect POST and GET parameters for SQL control words out of context: UNION, SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, DROP, INFORMATION_SCHEMA.
  • Detect suspicious characters or encodings: unescaped quotes followed by SQL tokens, comment tokens (/*, –), long parameter values containing SQL markers.
  • Rate-limit repeated submissions from a single IP and block high-volume scanners.

Important: avoid broad blocking that would interfere with legitimate search queries or names; focus on endpoint-specific parameters and patterns.

Incident response: if you suspect successful exploitation

If evidence indicates exploitation, treat the site as compromised until cleaned. Follow these steps:

1. Contain

  • Take the site offline or place in maintenance mode.
  • Disable UsersWP plugin.
  • Revoke or reset credentials that may be compromised (admin accounts, API keys).

2. Preserve evidence

  • Export logs (web server, application, database) to a secure, immutable store for forensic analysis.
  • Create a full snapshot of files + database and preserve it.

3. Eradicate

  • Remove backdoors and malicious files — prefer restoring files from known-good backups.
  • Clean or restore the database from a pre-compromise backup where possible.
  • Update WordPress core, plugins and themes to latest stable versions.

4. Recover

  • Restore from verified clean backups if database integrity cannot be guaranteed.
  • Change all passwords for site users and rotate DB credentials.
  • Reissue any PKI or API credentials stored in the database.

5. Post-incident

  • Perform deeper audit: scheduled tasks, unauthorized plugins/themes, changed file permissions.
  • Monitor for recurrence for several weeks.
  • Notify affected users if data exfiltration occurred and provide remediation guidance.

If you are uncertain about recovery or the site hosts sensitive data, engage a professional incident response team experienced in WordPress breaches.

These practical, high-impact controls reduce risk across sites.

  1. Keep everything updated: Apply security updates to core, plugins and themes promptly.
  2. Principle of least privilege: Restrict user roles and avoid granting elevated privileges unless necessary.
  3. Secure registration and forms: Use CAPTCHA, rate-limiting and consider requiring authentication for sensitive forms.
  4. Use a Web Application Firewall: Perimeter protections that understand WordPress can block common exploitation patterns.
  5. Enforce parameterized queries: Developers must use prepared statements (wpdb->prepare) rather than concatenating input into SQL.
  6. Input validation and sanitization: Validate types and lengths; use WordPress sanitizers where appropriate.
  7. Secure configuration: Disable file editing in admin (define(‘DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT’, true)); use restrictive DB user privileges; keep backups offline and access-controlled.
  8. Logging and monitoring: Enable and retain web server, application and DB logs; alert on suspicious activity (new admin users, mass failed logins).

Developer guidance (how to fix the root cause)

Maintain plugin or custom code by reviewing how input is used in SQL queries. Typical fixes include:

  • Use prepared statements
    /* Wrong */
    $sql = "SELECT * FROM {$wpdb->prefix}my_table WHERE name = '" . $_POST['name'] . "'";
    
    /* Correct */
    $sql = $wpdb->prepare( "SELECT * FROM {$wpdb->prefix}my_table WHERE name = %s", $_POST['name'] );
  • Enforce strict typing and validation: Cast numeric values, check ranges and use whitelists for expected values.
  • Avoid user input for identifiers: Do not build table or column names from user input; if required, validate against a strict whitelist.
  • Escapes and limits: Escaping is a fallback, not a substitute for parameterization. Use esc_sql only for literal escaping combined with parameterization.
  • Security testing: Add unit tests for input handling, use static analysis and include fuzzing/payload tests in CI.

Recovery checklist (quick reference)

  • Update UsersWP to 1.2.45 or later.
  • Disable UsersWP if update is not possible immediately.
  • Rotate admin passwords and sensitive keys.
  • Audit wp_users and wp_usermeta for suspicious accounts.
  • Export and save logs for forensic review.
  • Scan filesystem for recently modified/unknown PHP files.
  • Restore from a clean backup if database integrity is suspect.
  • Apply targeted virtual patching to block SQLi patterns at UsersWP endpoints.
  • Re-evaluate user registration and front-end form exposure.

FAQ — quick answers

Q: Can an attacker take my site over using this vulnerability?
A: Yes. A successful SQL injection can lead to data theft, account takeover and persistent backdoors. Treat this with high priority.
Q: Is there an official patch?
A: Yes — UsersWP 1.2.45 contains the fix. Update now.
Q: Can I rely on a plugin malware scanner to confirm compromise?
A: Scanners are useful but not sufficient. For serious incidents, combine server logs, database logs and professional forensic analysis.

Conclusion

This SQL injection in UsersWP is a clear illustration of the danger posed by unsanitized input in front-end membership/profile flows. The immediate technical fix is to update to 1.2.45. Beyond that, apply layered protections, monitor aggressively and harden both configuration and code practices to reduce future exposure.

Inventory all instances of UsersWP across your estate and prioritise patching. If updating is not immediately possible, contain exposure by disabling the plugin, closing registration, applying targeted virtual patching and reviewing logs closely.

Offer of assistance

If you wish, I can:

  • Provide step-by-step WAF rules in ModSecurity or common proxy formats tailored to UsersWP endpoints (conservative, low false-positive patterns).
  • Create a prioritized rollout checklist you can copy into a ticketing system for patch deployment.
  • Help draft an internal notification template for stakeholders and users if you detect compromise.

Stay vigilant — patch promptly and assume that low-privilege user input may be dangerous.

0 Shares:
You May Also Like