Hong Kong Security Advisory IMS Countdown XSS(CVE202411755)

Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in WordPress IMS Countdown Plugin
Plugin Name IMS Countdown
Type of Vulnerability Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
CVE Number CVE-2024-11755
Urgency Low
CVE Publish Date 2026-02-03
Source URL CVE-2024-11755





Urgent: Stored XSS in IMS Countdown (≤ 1.3.5) — What WordPress Site Owners and Developers Must Do Now


Urgent: Stored XSS in IMS Countdown (≤ 1.3.5) — What WordPress Site Owners and Developers Must Do Now

Published: 3 February 2026

Summary from a Hong Kong security expert: a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability affecting the IMS Countdown plugin (versions ≤ 1.3.5) was disclosed (CVE-2024-11755). An authenticated user with Contributor privileges can inject persistent JavaScript into plugin-managed content; that script may execute later when other users—including administrators or visitors—view the affected content. Treat this seriously and act quickly.

Quick summary (TL;DR)

  • Stored XSS in IMS Countdown (≤ 1.3.5) allows a Contributor to inject persistent JavaScript payloads.
  • Fixed in IMS Countdown 1.3.6 — update immediately to that version or later.
  • If you cannot update right away: deactivate the plugin, restrict Contributor privileges, search for suspicious content, rotate sensitive credentials, and apply targeted mitigations.
  • Long-term: enforce input sanitization and escaping, capability checks, and layered defenses (CSP, monitoring, and WAF where applicable).

What happened (technical overview)

Stored XSS occurs when untrusted input is saved by the application and later rendered without proper escaping. For IMS Countdown (≤ 1.3.5):

  • The plugin accepts content from authenticated users (Contributor or higher).
  • Input was not adequately sanitized before being stored or rendered, allowing HTML/JavaScript to persist.
  • Any user who views the page, widget, admin preview, or dashboard panel rendering the stored data may execute the attacker’s script.
  • The exploit requires a logged-in Contributor to perform the injection; the CVSS reported is around 6.5 in published materials.

Contributors can create content that is sometimes rendered in contexts visible to administrators or the public (shortcodes, previews, widgets), which is why this privilege level is significant.

Real-world impact scenarios

  • Account takeover: scripts can exfiltrate cookies or tokens when executed by admins.
  • Defacement and spam: injected scripts may display unwanted content, create redirects, or insert hidden links.
  • Supply-chain risk: hijacked admin sessions can be used to push malicious code into other systems.
  • Credential harvesting and phishing: fake admin prompts can capture privileged credentials.
  • Reputation and SEO impact: malicious redirects or content can lead to blacklisting or search penalties.

Even a small widget can be a high-impact vector because the payload executes in visitors’ or administrators’ browsers.

Who is at risk?

  • Sites with IMS Countdown installed and active on versions ≤ 1.3.5.
  • Sites that permit Contributor-level registrations or external contributors.
  • Sites that render Contributor-provided content in admin previews, widgets, or public pages without additional checks.

Immediate actions (what to do in the next 1–24 hours)

  1. Update the plugin to 1.3.6 (or later) right away. This is the definitive fix. Apply the update on production immediately or schedule an emergency maintenance window.
  2. If you cannot update immediately, deactivate the plugin. Deactivation prevents the plugin’s rendering code from exposing stored payloads. If the widget is essential, replace it temporarily with static content.
  3. Lock down Contributor uploads and input. Disable new Contributor registrations or restrict their ability to create content that is rendered publicly or by admins.
  4. Search for suspicious stored content. Inspect countdown entries, shortcodes, post meta, and plugin-specific tables for <script> tags, inline event handlers (onerror, onclick), or encoded payloads. Remove or sanitize offending records and review the author accounts.
  5. Rotate credentials and invalidate sessions where appropriate. Force password resets and sign out active sessions for administrative users if you suspect exposure.
  6. Run malware scans and file integrity checks. Scan plugin/theme directories and uploads for unexpected files or changes. Check timestamps for unusual modifications.
  7. Take a backup. Capture a fresh site and database backup before major changes for forensic and recovery purposes.
  8. Enable logging and monitoring. Turn on audit logging for content edits, user logins, and configuration changes. Review server logs for suspicious POSTs or payload patterns.

Medium-term actions (next 24–72 hours)

  • Apply targeted mitigations at the HTTP layer. Use your WAF or server request filters to block requests that attempt to store scripts in plugin fields or that match common XSS patterns. These are temporary compensating controls while you patch and clean up.
  • Review user accounts and roles. Audit all users with Contributor or higher roles; remove or downgrade suspicious accounts. Enforce strong passwords and 2FA for privileged users.
  • Sanitize existing stored content. Programmatically remove script tags and dangerous attributes from plugin-managed records using server-side sanitization.
  • Scan other themes and plugins. Check other components that accept untrusted HTML and prioritize updates for any with similar exposure.
  • Inform stakeholders. Notify editors, site owners, and administrators about the vulnerability and steps taken. Share detection indicators and expected user-visible symptoms.

How a WAF (Web Application Firewall) helps — and what to do with it now

A properly configured WAF offers defence-in-depth: it can reduce attack surface while you patch or remediate. Key benefits in this case:

  • Virtual patching: block or normalize dangerous inputs at the HTTP layer before they reach WordPress or the plugin.
  • Role-aware rules: apply stricter validation or blocking for requests from low-privilege roles (e.g., Contributors).
  • Behavioral detection: identify spikes in content submissions or repeated attempts from the same IPs.
  • Automated mitigations: throttle, challenge, or block suspicious clients attempting to submit payloads.

Important: WAF rules are temporary mitigations. They reduce risk but do not replace applying the vendor patch (1.3.6).

Suggested defensive patterns (conceptual)

  • Block POST requests to plugin save endpoints when the decoded body contains “
  • Strip or reject rich HTML submitted by low-privilege roles; allow only plain text or a small safe subset.
  • Rate-limit or require CAPTCHA for new contributor accounts or for accounts younger than a specified age.
  • Inspect decoded payloads to prevent bypasses via encoding or obfuscation.

Test any rule in monitoring mode first to avoid breaking legitimate workflows.

Developer guidance: how this should have been prevented

For plugin and theme developers, adopt these concrete practices to avoid stored XSS:

  1. Validate capabilities and nonces. Use current_user_can() and verify nonces for form submissions or AJAX endpoints.
  2. Sanitize input on save. Use sanitize_text_field(), sanitize_email(), intval(), or wp_kses() with a strict whitelist for any allowed HTML.
  3. Escape on output. Use esc_html(), esc_attr(), esc_textarea(), esc_url(), or wp_kses_post() depending on context.
  4. Avoid storing unfiltered HTML from low-privilege users. Only accept trusted HTML from trusted roles; otherwise store plain text or sanitized content.
  5. Disallow dangerous attributes. Event handlers and javascript: URIs should be prohibited.
  6. Use CSP. Deploy a Content Security Policy to reduce the impact of XSS; avoid ‘unsafe-inline’ for scripts if possible.
  7. Log dangerous submissions. Keep secure logs for investigation and purge them after incident handling.

Example: safe storage pattern (PHP)

<?php
if ( ! current_user_can( 'edit_posts' ) ) {
    wp_die( 'Insufficient permissions.' );
}
check_admin_referer( 'ims_countdown_save' );

// For untrusted users: strip HTML and save plain text
$label = isset( $_POST['label'] ) ? sanitize_text_field( wp_unslash( $_POST['label'] ) ) : '';

// For trusted HTML from trusted users: allow a strict subset
$content = isset( $_POST['countdown_html'] ) ? wp_kses( wp_unslash( $_POST['countdown_html'] ), array(
    'a' => array( 'href' => true, 'title' => true ),
    'strong' => array(),
    'em' => array(),
    // avoid event handlers and style attributes
) ) : '';

// Escaping at render
echo esc_html( $label );
// or for sanitized HTML:
echo wp_kses_post( $content );
?>

Incident response checklist (concise)

  1. Update IMS Countdown to 1.3.6 immediately.
  2. If update is not possible, deactivate the plugin.
  3. Audit Contributor accounts and disable or reset suspicious ones.
  4. Search plugin-specific database tables and post meta for script tags or encoded scripts; sanitize or remove them.
  5. Rotate admin passwords and invalidate sessions where appropriate.
  6. Rescan for malware and backdoors; restore from a known-clean backup if necessary.
  7. Apply temporary HTTP-layer mitigations and monitoring for plugin endpoints.
  8. Harden development processes (code review, sanitization policies).
  9. Document timeline and evidence for future reference.

Detection tips — what to look for

  • New or modified countdown items created by Contributor accounts around the disclosure date.
  • Shortcodes, post meta, or plugin fields containing “<script”, “javascript:”, or on* attributes.
  • Unexpected admin popups, redirects, or prompts during dashboard visits.
  • Traffic spikes from a limited set of IPs focused on content submission endpoints.
  • Unexpected outbound connections from the site (possible exfiltration beacons).

Why upgrading is not optional

HTTP-layer controls and filters are compensating measures; they can reduce exposure but do not fix the underlying bug. The vendor patch (1.3.6) removes the vulnerability and is the definitive remediation.

Where to get help

If you need assistance beyond your in-house team, engage a trusted security professional or incident responder. In Hong Kong, there are experienced consultants and firms familiar with WordPress security and incident response; choose one with verifiable references and clear scope-of-work for containment, remediation, and forensic review.

Below are conceptual patterns to implement in your WAF or server filtering layer. Adapt and test per your environment.

  • Block if decoded POST body contains “<script” and the request target is the plugin save endpoint.
  • Reject or sanitize HTML containing event handler attributes (onerror=, onclick=, onload=) for Contributor role requests.
  • Strip or disallow javascript: URIs in anchor hrefs.
  • Require CAPTCHA or throttle POSTs to plugin AJAX endpoints for new or untrusted accounts.

Run rules in detection mode first to measure false positives before enforcement.

Long-term hardening: beyond the immediate fix

  • Maintain a plugin and theme inventory and a vulnerability management process.
  • Constrain where untrusted users may submit raw HTML; implement moderation workflows.
  • Enforce least privilege for accounts and regular account review.
  • Deploy CSP and secure headers (X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, etc.).
  • Continuous scanning, log review, and anomaly detection to reduce attacker dwell time.
  • Integrate security into development: code reviews, static analysis, and security tests.

Closing notes — prioritized action checklist

  1. Update IMS Countdown to 1.3.6 (highest priority).
  2. If you cannot update immediately: deactivate or replace the plugin, and apply temporary HTTP-layer mitigations.
  3. Audit Contributor accounts and sanitize any stored content that looks suspicious.
  4. Rotate admin credentials and invalidate sessions if there are signs of compromise.
  5. Enable continuous monitoring and logging; review WAF or server logs for exploit attempts until clean.

Small plugins can introduce serious risk if they accept untrusted HTML and render it. A layered approach — applying the patch, temporary HTTP-layer mitigations, secure development practices, and ongoing monitoring — is the safest path.

If you need immediate assistance with containment, log review, or remediation, engage a qualified security professional. Act quickly and document each step for later review.

Stay vigilant. In Hong Kong and across the region, prompt patching and pragmatic controls separate a minor incident from a major one.


0 Shares:
You May Also Like