Plugin Name | Solace Extra |
---|---|
Type of Vulnerability | SSRF |
CVE Number | CVE-2025-58203 |
Urgency | Low |
CVE Publish Date | 2025-08-27 |
Source URL | CVE-2025-58203 |
Solace Extra <= 1.3.2 — SSRF (CVE-2025-58203): What WordPress site owners need to know and how to protect themselves
Date: 27 August 2025 | Author: Hong Kong Security Expert
Summary: A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was reported in the Solace Extra WordPress plugin affecting versions <= 1.3.2 (fixed in 1.3.3). The flaw allows an authenticated administrator to cause the site to perform HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations — including internal network resources — potentially exposing sensitive data or enabling further attacks. CVSS 4.4 (Low), CVE-2025-58203.
What is SSRF and why it matters for WordPress
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) is a vulnerability class in which an attacker causes a server to make network requests on their behalf. Instead of connecting directly to a target, the attacker controls an input that the server uses to fetch or relay data. When that server can reach internal resources (localhost, intranet services, cloud metadata endpoints), SSRF becomes a powerful reconnaissance and escalation tool.
Why SSRF matters in WordPress:
- Many plugins accept user input that triggers server-side HTTP requests (remote images, webhooks, previews, embeds, URL fetchers). Insufficient validation of those inputs can lead to SSRF.
- WordPress often runs in hosting environments with internal services (database consoles, management interfaces, cloud metadata services). SSRF can reach endpoints not exposed to the public internet.
- Even when an exploit requires administrator privileges, admin accounts are frequently targeted via phishing, credential reuse, or social engineering. Any issue that increases an attacker’s reach should be treated seriously.
The Solace Extra issue in brief
- Affected software: Solace Extra WordPress plugin
- Vulnerable versions: ≤ 1.3.2
- Fixed in: 1.3.3 (upgrade recommended)
- CVE: CVE-2025-58203
- Severity (reported): Low, CVSS 4.4
- Required privilege: Administrator
- Discovery credit: Security researcher (responsible disclosure)
The plugin accepted input that could be used by the application to perform HTTP(S) requests without adequate validation of the target destination. Because the feature was accessible to administrators, an attacker with an elevated account could make the site fetch attacker-controlled URLs — including internal addresses — resulting in SSRF.
Realistic exploitation scenarios
Understanding realistic scenarios helps prioritise response and mitigation.
-
Privileged insider or compromised admin account
If an attacker controls an admin account (phished credentials, reused passwords, or a malicious admin), they can trigger SSRF to enumerate internal services (127.0.0.1:3306, cloud metadata 169.254.169.254, internal admin panels). Tokens, service-account secrets, or endpoints useful for further attacks may be retrieved.
-
Secondary attack via social engineering
If a developer, agency, or site manager with admin access is tricked into performing plugin actions that fetch a malicious URL, SSRF can be exploited without the attacker directly stealing admin credentials.
-
Local network or cloud metadata access
Cloud metadata endpoints (AWS, GCP, Azure) often expose credentials or instance data. SSRF may allow reading those endpoints and escalating privileges externally. Internal management consoles (phpMyAdmin, Elasticsearch, Solr) may also be exposed via SSRF.
-
Information disclosure and fingerprinting
SSRF can map internal topology, open ports, and services, aiding a larger compromise plan.
Note: this specific vulnerability requires administrative privileges to trigger, which limits unauthenticated remote exploitation. However, because admin accounts are high-value targets, treat SSRF with urgency.
Immediate steps every site owner should take (ordered)
- Upgrade first
Update Solace Extra to version 1.3.3 or later immediately. This is the simplest and most reliable fix.
- If you cannot upgrade right away, deactivate the plugin
Disable the plugin from WordPress admin (Plugins → Installed Plugins) until you can update safely.
- Audit administrator accounts
Review administrator users. Remove unknown accounts and rotate admin passwords. Enforce two-factor authentication (2FA) for administrators where possible.
- Check logs for suspicious activity
Search for admin actions related to the plugin (timestamps, IPs, unusual parameters). Inspect web server access logs, PHP error logs, and any WordPress activity logs. Look for requests containing external or internal URLs passed to plugin endpoints.
- Run a malware scan
Perform a full site scan for webshells and suspicious files. If compromise is suspected, consider professional incident response.
- Review outgoing network access
Apply host egress rules or firewall rules to block unexpected outbound connections from the web server to internal IP ranges and cloud metadata IPs where feasible.
- Notify your team and hosting provider
Inform your hosting provider if you detect suspicious activity. They can help isolate the server, snapshot disks, and collect forensic evidence.
Detection: what to look for (indicators of potential SSRF usage)
- Access logs showing admin/plugin requests that include URL parameters or fetch targets (e.g., ?url= or ?fetch=).
- Requests with internal IPs in parameters (127.0.0.1, 169.254.169.254, 10.x.x.x, 172.16.x.x–172.31.x.x, 192.168.x.x).
- Unexpected outbound connections from the web server to internal addresses — check firewall, netstat, or eBPF traces.
- WP cron jobs or scheduled tasks making unexpected external calls.
- New or modified files in wp-content or wp-uploads that could be webshells.
- Login attempts, password resets, or 2FA bypasses preceding plugin actions — potential account takeover indicators.
Example log search queries:
grep -i "solace" access.log | grep -E "url=|fetch=|target="
grep -E "169\.254\.169\.254|127\.0\.0\.1|10\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+|172\.1[6-9]\.|172\.2[0-9]\.|172\.3[0-1]\.|192\.168\." access.log
Network and host-level mitigations
Even after upgrading, egress controls reduce the SSRF blast radius.
- Egress filtering: Block or limit outbound HTTP/S from the web server to internal IP ranges and known cloud metadata endpoints at the host or network firewall. Only allow outbound access to required third-party APIs. Example: deny outbound traffic to 169.254.169.254 from the web server user.
- Block internal ranges from HTTP client libraries: At application level or via a WAF, disallow requests where parameters resolve to internal IPs or RFC1918 addresses.
- Metadata protection: For cloud servers, enable instance metadata protection features (e.g., IMDSv2 on AWS) and similar cloud-provider protections.
- Host hardening: Keep PHP, WordPress core, and all plugins/themes up to date. Run the application under a user with minimal privileges and restrict filesystem permissions to prevent PHP from writing to executable locations.
WAF and virtual patching: immediate protections
A Web Application Firewall (WAF) or similar virtual patching can provide near‑immediate protection while you prepare the upgrade and harden the environment. Typical WAF actions for SSRF include:
- Block requests with parameters containing internal IPs or cloud metadata addresses.
- Block admin endpoint requests that include URL parameters resolving to RFC1918, link-local, or loopback addresses.
- Alert on suspicious admin endpoint activity (plugin AJAX endpoints used with URL parameters).
- Monitor and log attempts so you can investigate and correlate with other indicators.
Suggested conceptual WAF rule logic:
If request path matches plugin admin endpoint AND request body or query string contains internal or metadata addresses, then block and log.
Illustrative ModSecurity rule (adapt to your environment):
# Block SSRF attempts with internal or metadata IPs in parameters
SecRule ARGS|REQUEST_BODY|QUERY_STRING "@rx (169\.254\.169\.254|127\.0\.0\.1|10\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}|192\.168\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3})" \
"id:1009001,phase:2,deny,log,msg:'Potential SSRF attempt - internal address in request',severity:2"
Tune rules to avoid false positives on legitimate use cases. Test in staging before applying widely.
Detailed remediation checklist
- Upgrade plugin to 1.3.3 or later immediately.
- If upgrade is not possible: deactivate the plugin and apply WAF rules blocking internal addresses and metadata IPs in parameters.
- Enforce admin security: force password resets, enforce strong passwords and 2FA, audit admin accounts and remove unnecessary admins.
- Harden outbound connectivity: apply egress rules to prevent the server contacting internal or cloud metadata IPs.
- Perform a full site/server audit: scan for webshells, changed files, and suspicious cron jobs. Review recent uploads and PHP files in wp-content.
- Rotate keys/tokens discovered on the server (database credentials, API keys).
- If compromise detected: isolate the server, take forensic snapshots, rebuild if deep persistence is suspected, and restore from known-good backups after cleaning.
- Enable and retain logs (access, error, firewall logs) for at least 90 days where possible and configure alerts for suspicious activity.
If you suspect a compromise — incident response steps
- Contain: Isolate the affected server (remove from load balancer, restrict network access). Disable the vulnerable plugin if not already done.
- Preserve evidence: Take disk images and capture memory if feasible. Preserve logs and configuration snapshots.
- Triage: Identify indicators of compromise (webshells, new admin users, suspicious scheduled tasks).
- Eradicate: Remove backdoors and malicious files. Reinstall WordPress core and plugins from clean sources. Rebuild the server if necessary.
- Recover: Restore from clean backups, apply all patches, rotate credentials and revoke exposed tokens.
- Post-incident: Conduct root cause analysis and implement controls to prevent recurrence (WAF rules, egress filtering, 2FA). Consider an external security review if the incident was severe.
If you lack internal security capability, engage a trusted security provider experienced in WordPress incident response for assistance.
Developer guidance — secure coding patterns to prevent SSRF
For teams building or maintaining plugins that perform server-side HTTP requests, adopt the following practices:
- Allow-list destinations: Validate destination hosts against a strict allow-list of permitted domains or services. Do not rely solely on blacklists.
- Resolve and validate IPs: Resolve hostnames and disallow requests that map to internal IP ranges (RFC1918, link-local, loopback) and cloud metadata addresses. Protect against DNS rebinding.
- Restrict protocols and responses: Limit to HTTP/HTTPS and disallow file://, gopher://, ftp:// unless explicitly required. Limit response size and timeout durations.
- Sanitize input: Normalise input and reject encoded or obfuscated IP values (e.g., 0x7f000001). Use robust URL parsing libraries for consistent validation.
- Least privilege: Run HTTP client calls under contexts with minimal filesystem/network privileges and avoid exposing sensitive tokens in plugin settings or logs.
- Logging and alerts: Log fetch attempts and alert when requests target unexpected IP ranges or domains.
Practical detection rules you can add to your logs/WAF
- Alert when an admin endpoint receives a query parameter containing an IPv4/IPv6 or metadata URL pattern.
- Alert on outbound connection attempts from the PHP process to internal IPs or the cloud metadata IP.
- Create a rate-limited alert for repeated admin actions that include URL fetch parameters (often indicates automated enumeration).
Example regex for matching private IPv4 addresses in web requests:
\b(127\.0\.0\.1|10\.(?:[0-9]{1,3}\.){2}[0-9]{1,3}|172\.(?:1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.(?:[0-9]{1,3}\.)[0-9]{1,3}|192\.168\.(?:[0-9]{1,3}\.)[0-9]{1,3}|169\.254\.169\.254)\b
Tune and test these patterns in a staging environment to reduce false positives.
Why plugin updates alone aren’t enough
Patching the plugin fixes the vulnerable code path, but consider:
- If SSRF was exploited earlier, secrets (tokens, keys) may already be compromised — rotate them.
- An attacker may have left persistence (webshells, cron jobs) that require removal.
- Future vulnerabilities are inevitable. Layered defenses (WAF, egress filtering, strong account controls) reduce the risk that a new issue leads to compromise.
Long-term hardening and best practices
- Principle of least privilege: Limit the number of administrators and use granular roles.
- Enforce 2FA for privileged accounts to reduce risk from credential theft.
- Server isolation and egress control: Restrict what your web server can reach — only allow necessary API endpoints.
- Timely updates and plugin hygiene: Remove unused plugins/themes and apply updates promptly.
- Continuous monitoring: Retain logs, run periodic scans, and monitor for anomalous admin activity.
- Periodic security reviews: Perform code audits for high-risk plugins and schedule penetration tests.
Example post-upgrade checklist (what to verify after upgrading to 1.3.3)
- Plugin version shows 1.3.3 or later in the Plugins admin screen.
- Clear caches and test the feature that performs URL fetches with safe known hosts.
- Enable WAF rules that detect SSRF patterns and monitor for any remaining exploit attempts.
- Rotate critical credentials and API tokens if there is any suspicion of previous exploitation.
- Perform a post-upgrade scan for suspicious files and scheduled tasks.
Real-world note from incident desk
SSRF that requires admin privileges is less likely to be exploited at scale than unauthenticated flaws, but impact can be severe. In several engagements we observed SSRF used to access cloud metadata services, extract short-lived credentials, and then use those to spin up resources or exfiltrate data. Preventing that chain requires both application fixes and network controls.
Closing thoughts
The Solace Extra SSRF (CVE-2025-58203) is a reminder that admin-only features can still enable significant risk. Attackers frequently combine lower-severity issues with weak controls (poor passwords, no 2FA, permissive egress rules) to escalate to a full compromise. Immediate and layered action is the fastest effective response:
- Apply the vendor patch (upgrade plugin to 1.3.3+) immediately.
- Use WAF/virtual patching and egress filtering as compensating controls while you patch and verify.
- Harden admin access and rotate credentials where necessary.
- Monitor logs, scan for signs of compromise, and have an incident response plan ready.
If you need assistance implementing WAF rules, egress controls, or an incident response plan, engage a reputable security provider with WordPress experience.