Hong Kong Security Alert SSRF in BuddyPress(CVE202411913)

Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in WordPress Activity Plus Reloaded for BuddyPress Plugin
प्लगइन का नाम Activity Plus Reloaded for BuddyPress
कमजोरियों का प्रकार SSRF
CVE संख्या CVE-2024-11913
तात्कालिकता मध्यम
CVE प्रकाशन तिथि 2026-02-03
स्रोत URL CVE-2024-11913






Analyzing CVE-2024-11913: Authenticated Subscriber Blind SSRF in Activity Plus Reloaded for BuddyPress — What WordPress Site Owners Must Do Now


Analyzing CVE-2024-11913: Authenticated Subscriber Blind SSRF in Activity Plus Reloaded for BuddyPress — What WordPress Site Owners Must Do Now

By: Hong Kong Security Expert — Date: 2026-02-04

Summary — A blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability (CVE-2024-11913) was disclosed on 3 Feb 2026 affecting Activity Plus Reloaded for BuddyPress (versions ≤ 1.1.1). An authenticated user with Subscriber privileges can trigger server-side requests to attacker-controlled or internal addresses. The plugin author released version 1.1.2 to address the issue. This post provides a technical explanation, realistic risk scenarios, detection guidance, and practical mitigations that site owners can implement immediately.

सामग्री की तालिका

SSRF क्या है और यह क्यों महत्वपूर्ण है

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) occurs when an attacker can coerce a server into sending HTTP (or other protocol) requests to arbitrary destinations using input supplied by the attacker. The danger of SSRF comes from the server’s network reachability: servers often have access to internal systems and cloud metadata services which are not reachable from the public internet.

Why SSRF is dangerous:

  • It can expose internal services not meant to be public (admin APIs, internal databases, cloud metadata endpoints such as 169.254.169.254).
  • It enables enumeration of internal network topology.
  • It can lead to credential theft via metadata services, privilege escalation, or lateral movement.
  • Blind SSRF (where the attacker receives no direct response) still allows attackers to confirm requests via out-of-band channels (DNS callbacks, external logging endpoints).

For WordPress sites on shared, VPS, or cloud infrastructure, treat SSRF seriously even if the attacker is a low-privileged authenticated user.

What “blind SSRF” and “authenticated (Subscriber) SSRF” mean in practice

  • Blind SSRF: the attacker causes the server to make a request but does not receive the response directly. Attackers rely on side channels (DNS, callbacks) to confirm the request. Blind SSRF is still actionable for reconnaissance and exfiltration.
  • Authenticated (Subscriber) SSRF: the vulnerability requires authentication as at least the Subscriber role. Many WordPress sites permit open registration or have existing subscriber accounts, so this vector is realistic on community-enabled sites such as those running BuddyPress.

The Activity Plus Reloaded vulnerability (CVE-2024-11913): concise technical summary

Affected software: Activity Plus Reloaded for BuddyPress — versions ≤ 1.1.1. Fixed in version 1.1.2. CVE: CVE-2024-11913.

Short technical description: A plugin functionality allowed authenticated users (Subscriber role and above) to submit input that was used in server-side requests without sufficient validation or host allowlisting. This permitted blind SSRF — the server would issue HTTP requests to attacker-controlled or internal addresses based on user-supplied parameters.

प्रमुख विशेषताएँ:

  • CVSS base score reported at a medium level (example: 5.4), but real-world risk depends on hosting and site configuration.
  • The vulnerability is blind SSRF and frequently relies on out-of-band confirmation techniques.
  • If applicable to your site, install the fixed release (1.1.2) immediately.

वास्तविक हमलावर परिदृश्य और प्रभाव

Impact varies by hosting environment. Below are practical exploitation scenarios:

1. Accessing cloud metadata endpoints

Cloud metadata services (commonly at 169.254.169.254) can expose temporary credentials and IAM roles. An SSRF that reaches this address may allow retrieval of credentials and enable further compromise. Blind SSRF can exfiltrate data via DNS or callbacks.

2. Internal port scanning and service discovery

An attacker can iterate requests against internal IP ranges (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16, 127.0.0.1) to identify listening services and admin endpoints. Discovery of an internal admin API (Redis, CouchDB, etc.) can lead to greater impact.

3. Forcing server-to-server interactions with attacker infrastructure

Attackers can cause the server to request attacker-controlled URLs, triggering interactions with other systems or creating logs/metrics revealing environment context. This chaining may be combined with other weaknesses.

4. Blind SSRF with DNS callbacks or logging

By requesting unique hostnames (e.g., <random>.attacker.com), attackers confirm SSRF via DNS or external logs. This technique is common for reconnaissance.

5. Abuse of alternative schemes

If server code supports non-http schemes (file://, gopher://, ldap://), SSRF may allow access to local files or services depending on the request handler implementation.

Impact summary: On strict shared hosting the impact may be limited; on cloud or poorly isolated networks it can be severe, including credential theft and hosting compromise.

Immediate emergency actions (first 24 hours)

  1. तुरंत अपडेट करें।. Update Activity Plus Reloaded to version 1.1.2 or later. This is the definitive fix.
  2. यदि आप तुरंत अपडेट नहीं कर सकते हैं, तो प्लगइन को निष्क्रिय करें।. Remove or deactivate the plugin until you can safely upgrade.
  3. Limit new registrations. If your site allows open registration, temporarily disable it to prevent new malicious subscriber accounts.
  4. Rotate critical secrets when suspicious activity is detected. If you observe suspicious outbound requests or unusual activity, rotate API keys and consider rotating cloud credentials if metadata access is suspected.
  5. Block sensitive egress points at the network level. If you control egress policies, block the cloud metadata IP and private/internal ranges from the web server.

Recommended short-term mitigations (next 72 hours)

  • Apply the plugin update (1.1.2).
  • Harden user roles and registration. Audit Subscriber accounts and remove or disable suspicious users. Add email verification, CAPTCHA, or manual approval if registration is necessary.
  • Deploy WAF rules to detect SSRF attempts. Detect and block parameters containing private IPs, metadata IPs, or suspicious schemes.
  • Implement egress filtering. Block outgoing connections from the web server to internal/private ranges and the cloud metadata IP. If too blunt, at minimum block 169.254.169.254.
  • Disable remote-content features in the plugin. Temporarily disable any plugin features that fetch or proxy remote content until patched.
  • Enable outbound request logging. Log outgoing HTTP requests or use host tools to capture outbound connections and monitor for unusual destinations.
  • Apply least privilege to server processes. Ensure web processes run with minimal filesystem and process privileges.

WAF rules and example configurations

Below are practical rule templates. Adapt and test in a non-production environment. Syntax and features vary by WAF.

1) Generic inbound rule (block private IPs in parameters)

# Example mod_security-style rule
SecRule ARGS "(?:\b(?:127(?:\.\d{1,3}){3}|10(?:\.\d{1,3}){3}|172\.(?:1[6-9]|2\d|3[0-1])(?:\.\d{1,3}){2}|192\.168(?:\.\d{1,3}){2}|169\.254(?:\.\d{1,3}){2})\b)" \
    "phase:2,deny,log,id:100001,rev:1,msg:'Possible SSRF attempt - private IP in parameter',severity:CRITICAL"

2) Block cloud metadata IP references

SecRule REQUEST_URI|ARGS|REQUEST_HEADERS "(169\.254\.169\.254|169\.254)" \
    "phase:2,deny,log,id:100002,rev:1,msg:'Block cloud metadata SSRF attempt',severity:CRITICAL"

3) Block suspicious URL schemes

SecRule ARGS "(?:file://|gopher://|dict://|ldap://|expect://)" \
    "phase:2,deny,log,id:100003,rev:1,msg:'Block non-http scheme (possible SSRF)',severity:HIGH"

4) Treat risky AJAX endpoints more strictly

SecRule REQUEST_URI "@contains admin-ajax.php|/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php|/wp-json/activity-plus/" \
    "phase:2,chain,pass,id:100010"
SecRule ARGS:remote_url "@rx (https?://|[0-9]{1,3}\.)" "t:none,deny,log,msg:'Block remote_url param to ajax endpoint',severity:HIGH"

5) Host-level egress controls (iptables examples)

# Block metadata service
iptables -A OUTPUT -d 169.254.169.254 -j REJECT

# Block RFC1918 from web server (if appropriate)
iptables -A OUTPUT -d 10.0.0.0/8 -j REJECT
iptables -A OUTPUT -d 172.16.0.0/12 -j REJECT
iptables -A OUTPUT -d 192.168.0.0/16 -j REJECT

6) NGINX + Lua pseudo-filter (concept)

-- Inside a request handler: inspect parameter named 'url' and block if it points to private IPs
local args = ngx.req.get_uri_args()
local target = args["url"]
if target then
  if string.find(target, "169.254.169.254", 1, true) or string.find(target, "10.", 1, true) then
    ngx.log(ngx.ERR, "Blocked SSRF attempt to: ", target)
    return ngx.exit(ngx.HTTP_FORBIDDEN)
  end
end

संचालन संबंधी नोट्स:

  • False positives are possible — tune rules carefully.
  • Consider quarantining or returning a generic response while monitoring before fully denying requests if your site relies on legitimate URL fetching.
  • Always log rule triggers for forensic review.

Detection: logs, scans and indicators of compromise

Detecting SSRF requires correlating multiple signals. Use the checklist and examples below.

1. Inspect web server access logs for suspicious parameters

# Find requests with 169.254
grep -i "169.254.169.254" /var/log/nginx/access.log

# Find requests with private IPs in query strings
grep -E "(\b10\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\b|\b192\.168\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\b|\b172\.1[6-9]\.|172\.2[0-9]\.|172\.3[0-1]\.)" /var/log/nginx/access.log

2. Correlate inbound requests with outbound connections

If you can log outgoing connections (firewall logs, tcpdump), search for outbound connections fired shortly after suspicious inbound requests.

3. Monitor DNS for attacker-controlled callbacks

Blind SSRF often uses DNS callbacks. Monitor DNS logs for unusual or unique hostnames referenced by your site.

4. Audit WordPress activity and user accounts

Review subscriber accounts for recent logins, automated patterns, or many similar requests to plugin endpoints.

5. Use vulnerability scanners

Run authorized scanners to detect vulnerable plugin versions and patch status. Use reputable tools and run them from authorized environments.

6. Watch host behavior

Monitor for unexpected processes initiating outbound HTTP requests or spikes in DNS requests.

7. If exploitation is suspected

  • Capture and preserve full logs and timestamps.
  • Contain (disable plugin, rotate credentials).
  • Contact your hosting provider for network-level logs and assistance.

Longer-term protections and platform hardening

Controls that materially reduce SSRF risk:

  • Egress filtering by default: adopt a whitelist model for outbound connections from web servers. Block metadata and internal ranges unless explicitly required.
  • न्यूनतम विशेषाधिकार: run web services with minimal privileges and only grant necessary filesystem/network access.
  • Host hardening: enforce AppArmor/SELinux profiles and use dedicated service accounts.
  • Secure plugin lifecycle: maintain strict update policies, monitor plugin changelogs, and vet plugins that perform network operations.
  • Input allowlists: for any code that accepts user-supplied URLs, use a strict allowlist of hosts, schemes and ports.
  • WAF + monitoring: use WAFs and logging to apply virtual patches and detect anomalies when immediate vendor fixes are delayed.
  • नेटवर्क विभाजन: separate web tier from highly sensitive infrastructure to limit blast radius.
  • Threat modeling for plugins: treat plugins that fetch remote content as higher-risk and audit their code or behavior.

यदि आपको सहायता की आवश्यकता है

If you require help implementing mitigations, reviewing logs, or applying WAF rules, engage a competent security professional or consult your hosting provider. Provide full logs and timestamps for efficient triage and avoid making destructive changes until you have captured forensic data.

Appendix: useful commands, search queries and quick-check list

Quick-check list for site owners

  • Update Activity Plus Reloaded to 1.1.2 (or remove the plugin).
  • Temporarily disable user registration if it is open.
  • Search logs for suspicious parameters (169.254, private IPs).
  • Verify outbound traffic does not reach internal or metadata addresses.
  • Rotate critical API keys if you suspect exploitation.
  • Enable egress filtering on web servers.
  • Apply tight WAF rules for SSRF patterns.

Helpful log search samples

# All requests containing an IP-like pattern
grep -Eo "([0-9]{1,3}\.){3}[0-9]{1,3}" /var/log/nginx/access.log | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | head

# Requests with 'remote_url' or similar parameter to plugin endpoints
grep -i "remote_url=" /var/log/nginx/access.log

# Look for 169.254 occurrences
grep -R "169.254" /var/log/nginx/* /var/log/apache2/*

Quick curl check for plugin version (if publicly accessible)

# Check installed plugin version via readme or plugin file if accessible
curl -s https://example.com/wp-content/plugins/bp-activity-plus-reloaded/readme.txt | grep -i "stable tag"
  • The single most important action: update to the patched version (1.1.2).
  • If immediate update is impossible, combine mitigations: disable the plugin, block metadata IP, apply WAF rules, and enable egress filtering.
  • Treat SSRF as high-risk in cloud deployments—prioritise network-level protections.
  • Maintain an incident-response plan: log retention, forensic capture, and an escalation path with your hosting provider.

If you would like, I can prepare:

  • A tailored WAF rule pack for your environment (nginx, Apache/mod_security, cloud WAF).
  • A short remediation checklist and scheduled timeline you can assign to your team.
  • A log review playbook to determine whether exploitation occurred.

Contact a professional security consultant or your hosting provider for hands-on remediation and forensic analysis.


0 शेयर:
आपको यह भी पसंद आ सकता है

काउंटडाउन शोषण के खिलाफ WordPress सुरक्षा को बढ़ाना (CVE202575498)

WordPress विशेष ऐडऑन के लिए Elementor प्लगइन <= 2.7.9.4 - प्रमाणित (योगदानकर्ता+) स्टोर क्रॉस-साइट स्क्रिप्टिंग काउंटडाउन सुरक्षा जोखिम के माध्यम से

सामुदायिक सलाह प्रोनामिक गूगल मैप्स XSS (CVE20259352)

वर्डप्रेस प्रोनामिक गूगल मैप्स प्लगइन <= 2.4.1 - प्रमाणित (योगदानकर्ता+) संग्रहीत क्रॉस-साइट स्क्रिप्टिंग भेद्यता