| Nom du plugin | WordPress User Language Switch plugin |
|---|---|
| Type de vulnérabilité | Script intersite (XSS) |
| Numéro CVE | CVE-2026-0735 |
| Urgence | Faible |
| Date de publication CVE | 2026-02-15 |
| URL source | CVE-2026-0735 |
CVE-2026-0735: What WordPress Site Owners Must Know About the User Language Switch Stored XSS
Auteur : Expert en sécurité de Hong Kong
Date : 2026-02-14
Short summary: A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability (CVE-2026-0735) was disclosed in the WordPress plugin “User Language Switch” affecting versions <= 1.6.10. The flaw allows an authenticated administrator to store malicious HTML/JavaScript via the
tab_color_picker_language_switchparameter. While exploitation requires administrator privileges and user interaction, consequences can include session theft, administrator account compromise and site defacement. This article explains the risk, realistic attack scenarios, detection and mitigation steps, and perimeter options you can apply immediately.
TL;DR (pour les propriétaires de sites occupés)
- Vulnerability: Stored XSS in User Language Switch plugin (<= 1.6.10) — CVE-2026-0735.
- Required privilege to inject: Administrator.
- Impact: Stored XSS — payload is saved and executed in the browser context of users who view the content (could include other admins). Potential for account compromise and persistent site-level script execution.
- Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.9) — user interaction required but impact can be significant on multi-admin sites.
- Immediate actions to consider:
- Restrict administrative access while you assess.
- Search and sanitize affected settings/DB fields (see detection steps).
- Apply virtual patching at the perimeter (WAF) if available.
- Update the plugin when a vendor fix is released; if none is available, consider disabling/removing the plugin.
- Rotate credentials and review admin sessions if suspicious activity is found.
Contexte : Que s'est-il passé
Security researchers disclosed a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issue in the “User Language Switch” WordPress plugin (versions <= 1.6.10). The vulnerable parameter is tab_color_picker_language_switch. When an administrator submits a crafted value for this parameter, the plugin may store it without sufficient sanitisation/escaping and later output it into pages where a visitor’s browser will interpret it. Because the input is persistent, an attacker with administrator access can inject script that executes when other users—including other administrators—view the affected page.
The vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2026-0735. Although administrator privileges are required to inject payloads, stored XSS in admin-facing areas remains a high-value vector attackers exploit to escalate access or maintain persistence.
Pourquoi cela importe — impact dans le monde réel
Stored XSS in plugin settings is not merely theoretical:
- Persistent execution: The payload is stored in the database and will execute for any user who loads the affected admin screen or frontend view.
- Admin-to-admin escalation: An attacker with admin access can target other administrators, stealing session cookies, exfiltrating CSRF tokens, or performing actions as the victim.
- Risque de chaîne d'approvisionnement : Compromised admin sessions can lead to plugin/theme installs, code injection, backdoors, or database tampering.
- Stealthy persistence: Payloads can be made dormant and activated later or under specific conditions, making detection harder.
Because administrator access is required for injection, protecting admin accounts (2FA, least privilege, regular audits) and applying perimeter mitigations are key controls.
Qui est à risque ?
- Sites running “User Language Switch” plugin version 1.6.10 or earlier with at least one administrator able to edit plugin settings.
- Multisite WordPress instances where admins can edit plugin settings.
- Agencies or hosts managing multiple client sites where admin credentials are shared without least-privilege controls.
If your site does not use this plugin, you are not directly affected by this CVE — but the detection and mitigation guidance below remains generally applicable for stored XSS incidents.
How an attack could play out (scenario)
- An attacker obtains administrator credentials or access to an admin account (phishing, credential reuse, compromised workstation).
- The attacker opens the plugin settings and sets the
tab_color_picker_language_switchparameter to a payload containing an XSS-capable string (e.g., event handlers or script tags). - The plugin stores the value in the database.
- When another administrator visits the affected settings page or any frontend/admin view that outputs the stored value, the injected script runs in the victim’s browser.
- The script exfiltrates the victim’s authentication cookie or nonce to the attacker or performs actions using the victim’s session.
- With a stolen session, the attacker gains control of the admin session and can install backdoors, modify content, or escalate persistence.
Note: The initial admin access is often the weakest link. Protect admin endpoints and user behaviour to lower risk.
Detecting if your site has been impacted
Make a full backup of files and database before modifying anything. Then follow careful detection steps:
-
Vérification de la version du plugin
- In WordPress admin → Plugins, confirm the installed version of “User Language Switch”.
- Via WP-CLI :
wp plugin list --format=csv | grep user-language-switch - If version <= 1.6.10, consider the plugin vulnerable.
-
Search the database for the parameter
- Many plugins store settings in
wp_options. Example WP-CLI/MySQL queries:wp db query "SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_value LIKE '%tab_color_picker_language_switch%' LIMIT 100;" -- or -- SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_value LIKE '%tab_color_picker_language_switch%' LIMIT 100; - Also check posts and user meta:
wp db query "SELECT ID, post_title FROM wp_posts WHERE post_content LIKE '%tab_color_picker_language_switch%' LIMIT 100;"
- Many plugins store settings in
-
Look for suspicious strings
Search matched values for
<script>,onerror=,onload=,javascript :or other event handlers. -
Check admin sessions and logs
- Inspect server access/error logs for unusual POSTs to admin pages.
- Check recent user logins in WordPress and terminate sessions if compromise is suspected.
If you find suspicious payloads, treat them as malicious and proceed to containment.
Immediate containment and remediation steps
- Sauvegarde : Take a full backup (database + files) before edits.
- Isolate and restrict admin access:
- Temporarily restrict admin access by IP where feasible.
- Require 2FA and strong passwords for administrators.
- Remove or sanitize the stored payload:
- If the payload is in
wp_optionsor post content, carefully remove malicious fragments or replace the option with a known-good default. - Avoid blind string replacements that can corrupt serialized PHP arrays. Use WordPress APIs or PHP-aware scripts to unserialize, sanitize, then reserialize safely.
- Example (cautious) WP-CLI sanitization:
wp db query "UPDATE wp_options SET option_value = REPLACE(option_value, 'Note: Manual review is recommended.
- If the payload is in
- Rotate credentials and terminate sessions:
- Force password resets for administrators.
- Destroy active sessions:
wp user session destroy <user_id> - Rotate API keys and external credentials if exposure is possible.
- Scan for backdoors: Perform a full filesystem scan for recently added/modified PHP files, especially under
wp-content/uploads,mu-plugins, and theme folders. - Disable or remove the plugin temporarily: If a vendor patch is not available and the plugin is not essential, deactivate or remove it until a fix is released or safe mitigations are in place.
- Monitor: Keep logs and enable alerting for further suspicious admin activity.
Important: Many plugin options are serialized. Use WordPress functions to read, modify and save options to preserve serialization.
Example WP-CLI / PHP approach to inspect and safely clean options (conceptual)
Concept: load the option through WordPress (so serialization is handled), inspect, and sanitize with PHP functions. Test on staging first.
<?php
// eval-file: sanitize-user-language-switch.php
$option_name_candidates = ['user_language_switch_options', 'uls_settings', 'whatever_the_plugin_uses']; // find actual option name first
foreach ($option_name_candidates as $opt) {
$val = get_option($opt);
if ($val === false) continue;
$json = print_r($val, true);
if (strpos($json, 'tab_color_picker_language_switch') !== false) {
// Inspect full value
var_export($val);
// Example sanitization — keep only safe HTML
$sanitized = wp_kses($val, array(
'span' => array('style' => true),
'div' => array('style' => true),
));
update_option($opt, $sanitized);
echo "Sanitized $opt
";
}
}
Run with:
wp eval-file sanitize-user-language-switch.php
This is illustrative. Always test in staging and ensure serialization is preserved.
How perimeter protections (WAF) can reduce exposure
A Web Application Firewall (WAF) or perimeter filtering can provide virtual patching: blocking obvious exploit payloads from reaching the application while you prepare a permanent fix. Typical protections include:
- Blocking requests where the vulnerable parameter contains script tags or inline event attributes.
- Blocking requests that include
javascript:URIs,document.cookiepatterns, or encoded payloads that decode to script. - Normalising and inspecting serialized payloads if the WAF supports decoding.
- Rate-limiting admin POSTs and enforcing nonce/CSRF validation at the application level.
If you have a managed WAF service or host-provided perimeter filtering, use it to deploy targeted virtual patches for the vulnerable parameter until the plugin is updated or removed.
Suggested WAF rules (examples you can adapt)
Conceptual rule examples to be tested in detect mode before blocking:
-
Block script tags in submissions for the specific parameter
# Pseudo-Syntax IF REQUEST_METHOD == POST AND (ARGS:tab_color_picker_language_switch CONTAINS "<script" OR ARGS:tab_color_picker_language_switch CONTAINS "onerror=" OR ARGS:tab_color_picker_language_switch CONTAINS "onload=") THEN BLOCK REQUEST -
Block javascript: URIs and cookie-stealing patterns
IF REQUEST_METHOD == POST AND (ARGS_NAMES_CONTAIN "tab_color_picker_language_switch" AND ARGS_VALUES_MATCH "(javascript:|document\.cookie|XMLHttpRequest|fetch\()") THEN BLOCK -
Decode and inspect serialized values
If the WAF supports decoding, scan decoded serialized data for script tags and event attributes.
Adopt a whitelist approach where possible: restrict admin POSTs to known admin IP ranges, require authenticated admin sessions, and validate expected content types.
Hardening your WordPress admin to prevent future exploitation
- Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication (2FA) for all administrative accounts.
- Apply least privilege: reduce the number of full administrators where Editor + capability adjustments suffice.
- Limit login attempts and consider IP-based access restrictions to wp-admin.
- Remove or rotate shared admin credentials; do not reuse passwords across sites.
- Vet plugins before installation and keep a strict plugin review process.
- Maintain frequent backups and a rapid rollback plan.
- Monitor admin activity and alert on configuration or plugin-setting changes.
Recovery checklist if you suspect exploitation
- Take a full backup (if not already done).
- Place the site in maintenance mode to limit exposure.
- Sanitize or remove malicious stored content (see detection section).
- Rotate admin passwords and terminate active sessions.
- Scan and remove any webshells/backdoors.
- Reinstall plugins/themes from trusted sources after verifying integrity.
- Apply perimeter virtual patching to block re-injection attempts.
- Review logs to determine the initial access vector and close that gap.
- Inform stakeholders and document the timeline and remediation steps.
Why perimeter protection matters even when plugins are patched
Patching is the primary long-term defence, but practical gaps exist:
- Vendor patches may be delayed or not immediately deployed by all sites.
- Sites often postpone updates due to compatibility concerns.
- Automated exploit attempts can target unpatched sites at scale.
A WAF provides immediate virtual patching, giving time to assess and deploy proper fixes without exposing the site. It also supplements detection and integrity checks that help find backdoors and post-compromise artefacts.
Practical detection queries and utilities
- WP-CLI: get plugin version:
wp plugin get user-language-switch --field=version - Search options table:
wp db query "SELECT option_id, option_name FROM wp_options WHERE option_value LIKE '%tab_color_picker_language_switch%'" - Find modified files in last 7 days (Linux):
find /path/to/wp-content -type f -mtime -7 -print - Scan for likely XSS artifacts:
wp db query "SELECT ID, post_title FROM wp_posts WHERE post_content REGEXP '
These queries can return false positives—manual review is essential.
Communication & disclosure best practices for site owners
- If you manage multiple client sites, inform affected stakeholders about the potential risk and steps taken.
- If you discover a compromise, document the timeline, affected resources, and remediation steps.
- Rotate keys, tokens, and credentials used by the site if there is any possibility of exposure.
Frequently asked questions
- Q: If only an admin can inject, is this a low-risk vulnerability?
- A: Not necessarily. Admin-level injection is high value to attackers — while the CVSS base score here is medium due to preconditions, the practical impact can be severe if an attacker uses stored XSS to seize admin sessions or install backdoors.
- Q: Should I immediately delete the plugin?
- A: If the plugin is confirmed vulnerable and cannot be safely patched, deactivating or removing it is a prudent choice. If the plugin is essential and no alternative exists, rely on perimeter virtual patching and strict admin controls until a fix is available.
- Q: Will a WAF block the exploit for me now?
- A: Properly configured WAF rules can block common injection patterns against the
tab_color_picker_language_switchparameter and similar vectors, reducing exposure while you remediate.
High-level WAF signatures (guidance)
- Block POST requests containing script tags or inline event attributes in known plugin parameters.
- Block encoded payloads that decode to
<script>ordocument.cookiepatterns. - Rate-limit admin POSTs and require valid nonces for admin-only actions.
Tune signatures to reduce false positives while maintaining protection.
After action: keep improving your defenses
Use incidents like CVE-2026-0735 to strengthen your security program:
- Regularly scan installed plugins for vulnerabilities.
- Maintain a patch-management schedule with quick testing and deployment.
- Use perimeter defenses for instant mitigation when needed.
- Enforce access control and logging to detect suspicious admin behaviour early.
Final thoughts (Hong Kong Security Expert)
Stored XSS vulnerabilities in administrative plugin settings are a clear reminder: administrative hygiene and robust perimeter controls matter. The most reliable solution is to update or replace vulnerable plugins and maintain strong admin controls. In the interim, apply virtual patches at the perimeter, sanitise stored values safely, and rotate credentials if compromise is suspected.
If you manage multiple WordPress sites, prioritise:
- WAF virtual patching and perimeter filtering where available,
- Strict admin access controls (2FA, least privilege),
- And an incident response plan with backups, logging, and rapid remediation steps.
Stay vigilant and treat security as an ongoing process.
— Hong Kong Security Expert