Aperçu

A disclosed vulnerability in the Aiomatic — Automatic AI Content Writer WordPress plugin (versions ≤ 2.0.5) allows unauthenticated actors to send arbitrary email from vulnerable sites. Tracked as CVE‑2024‑5969 (CVSS 5.8, medium), this is a broken access control flaw: an unauthenticated request can invoke an action that should require authorization.

From the perspective of Hong Kong organisations and regional operators: email sent from your domain is often trusted by customers, partners and regulators. Abuse of a sending capability without authentication is high risk — it can be used for phishing, reputation damage and as an initial attack vector. This advisory explains the technical issue, exploitation patterns, detection indicators, immediate mitigations you can apply now, developer guidance for permanent fixes, and an incident response checklist for administrators.

Important: If you run Aiomatic on any production site, check the plugin version immediately. If you cannot update safely right away, follow the temporary mitigation steps below.

Ce qu'est la vulnérabilité (langage simple)

• “Broken access control” means the plugin exposes functionality that should require authorization (for example: administrator privileges or a valid nonce), but the code fails to enforce that requirement.
• Here the exposed functionality is email sending. Because the plugin did not require authentication or verify a valid nonce/capability, an attacker can trigger the email-sending routine with unauthenticated HTTP requests to the plugin’s endpoint.
• An attacker can specify recipients, subject and body (depending on input parsing) and cause the site to dispatch arbitrary messages.

This is more than a nuisance. Unauthenticated arbitrary email sending can be used to:

• Run large-scale phishing or credential-harvesting campaigns from a trusted domain.
• Conduct Business Email Compromise (BEC) impersonations of site administrators.
• Damage reputation and cause domain/IP blacklisting.
• Exhaust email resources and trigger hosting restrictions or outages.
• Distribute malware or malicious links as part of broader campaigns.

Pourquoi cela importe pour les propriétaires de sites WordPress

WordPress sites are trusted by users and stakeholders. If attackers can make your site send convincing emails, recipients are more likely to accept malicious content. Potential consequences include credential theft, blacklisting of domains, hosting suspensions due to email abuse, and reputational harm. Because this flaw is exploitable without authentication, even low-traffic sites are at risk.

How attackers typically exploit this class of vulnerability

1. Discover a vulnerable plugin that exposes an email-sending endpoint (often an admin-ajax action, REST route, or direct PHP endpoint).
2. Craft HTTP requests containing parameters for recipients, subject, body, attachments or template identifiers.
3. Because capability/nonce checks are missing or insufficient, WordPress processes the request and calls wp_mail (or similar) to deliver the message.
4. Automate the process to send high volumes of email or target specific recipients with customised content.

Attackers may combine this with other weaknesses (for example, weak credentials) to escalate or persist.

Indicateurs de compromission (IoCs) — quoi rechercher maintenant

If you manage affected sites, investigate these signs immediately:

• Unexpected spikes in outgoing email volume. Check hosting and SMTP logs for anomalies.
• Outbound messages with unfamiliar subjects or templates that were not created by your team.
• Email bouncebacks, spam complaints, or reports from users about suspicious mail that appears to come from your domain.
• Web server access logs showing repeated POST/GET requests to plugin-related endpoints containing fields like à, sujet, message, ou e-mail.
• Demandes à admin-ajax.php, REST routes, or plugin endpoints with unusual parameters or originating from suspicious IPs or anonymising networks (TOR).
• New or modified scheduled tasks (wp_cron) that perform mail sends.
• Unauthorized new users or changes to user capabilities.
• Mail headers indicating “From” addresses in your domain but originating from your server — verify origin via mail logs and providers.

Preserve web, PHP and mail logs; they are essential for investigation and any required notifications.

Immediate, prioritised actions (site owners / admins)

1. Confirm version — Check whether Aiomatic is installed and if its version is ≤ 2.0.5. Treat the site as at risk if so.
2. Update immediately — If a fixed version (2.0.6 or later) is available and compatible with your environment, update the plugin as a priority during an appropriate maintenance window.
3. If you cannot update immediately, deactivate the plugin — Deactivation removes the vulnerable code path until you can update safely.
4. Apply virtual patching with a web application firewall (WAF) — If you operate a WAF, create rules that block unauthenticated access to any endpoint used for sending email by the plugin. Virtual patching can stop exploitation while you prepare a permanent fix.
5. Rate-limit outgoing mail — Configure hosting or SMTP providers to throttle sends (limit recipients per hour) to reduce spam and blacklist risk.
6. Block the plugin endpoint at the webserver — Use .htaccess or Nginx rules to deny direct access to identified plugin endpoints used for email sending until patched.
7. Review accounts and rotate credentials — Change passwords for administrative accounts and any API keys used for SMTP or integrations; enable strong authentication (2FA) where possible.
8. Scan and remediate — Run a full malware and integrity scan for backdoors, modified files or rogue scheduled tasks; remove any malicious content.
9. Monitor and notify — Monitor mail logs for suspicious activity and prepare to notify recipients and stakeholders if phishing or spam was sent from your domain.
10. Preserve logs and evidence — Save server, PHP, database and mail logs for incident timeline, scope analysis and any external reporting.

Example virtual-patch / WAF mitigation logic (conceptual)

Virtual patching via a WAF can block exploitation quickly. Below are conceptual approaches — exact rule syntax depends on your WAF product or proxy.

• Block unauthenticated access to plugin email endpoint:
  • If the plugin exposes an endpoint such as /wp-json/aiomatic/v1/send or an admin-ajax action like action=aiomatic_send_email, create a rule that returns 403 for POST requests to that path from non-authenticated sessions.
  • Rule logic example: IF request URI matches plugin email endpoint AND request method is POST AND request lacks a valid WordPress authentication cookie or valid site nonce → BLOCK.
• Enforce parameter whitelisting and validation:
  • Block requests containing a à= parameter with more than N recipients or multiple comma-separated addresses.
  • Bloquer à values that do not pass email validation patterns.
• Block suspicious mail content:
  • Block attempts that include common phishing phrases combined with external shorteners/domains when triggered via the email endpoint.
• Limitation de débit :
  • Limit the number of email-sending requests per IP or per endpoint per minute/hour.
• IP reputation enforcement:
  • Temporarily block or throttle requests from low-reputation IPs or anonymising networks when targeting plugin endpoints.
• Journalisation et alertes :
  • Log blocked attempts and create alerts when thresholds are exceeded (for example >10 blocked sends in 5 minutes).

Note: These are mitigation concepts. Apply rules carefully in a test environment before rolling out in production to avoid blocking legitimate traffic.

If your site was used to send phishing or spam

• Identify timeframe and scope: which messages, how many, and to whom.
• Notify recipients if the messages were confirmed malicious — prompt transparency helps reduce secondary harm.
• Contact your hosting or SMTP provider for mail queue management and reputation remediation assistance.
• If your domain/IP is blacklisted, follow the blacklist provider’s removal procedures after remediation and evidence of cleanup is provided.
• Search for persistence mechanisms: backdoors, modified files, rogue scheduled tasks, or unauthorised admin accounts — remove them and rotate keys.

Technical guidance for developers and plugin maintainers

Developers and maintainers should apply secure coding practices to prevent broken access control and related issues:

1. Enforce authentication and capabilities:
   • Any action that sends email must require a capability check such as current_user_can( 'manage_options' ) and reject unauthenticated requests.
2. Use nonces on UI-originated actions:
   • Require and verify nonces (e.g. check_admin_referer() ou wp_verify_nonce()) for AJAX and form actions. Nonces mitigate CSRF but do not replace capability checks.
3. Validez et assainissez les entrées :
   • Validate recipients with is_email(), disallow arbitrary address lists unless explicitly needed, and sanitise subject/body with appropriate functions (sanitize_text_field, wp_kses_post).
4. Limit recipient scope and rate:
   • Prevent arbitrary lists, consider allowlists for recipients and server-side rate limiting per account or IP.
5. Log and rate-limit sends:
   • Enforce server-side send logs and throttling independent of client code to detect abuse.
6. Use prepared templates and escape output:
   • Restrict template tags and escape user-provided content to prevent HTML misuse.
7. Prefer core mail routines and reputable providers:
   • Utilisez wp_mail() or established transactional providers rather than custom relay logic.
8. Add automated tests:
   • Include unit and integration tests that verify unauthenticated requests are rejected for privileged actions.

Developer patch example (conceptual)

Conceptual handler checks — adapt to plugin structure and project policies:

<?php
// Example conceptual checks - adapt to your plugin structure
add_action( 'wp_ajax_aiomatic_send', 'aiomatic_send_handler' );
// avoid registering a nopriv handler unless you have a secure reason
// add_action( 'wp_ajax_nopriv_aiomatic_send', 'aiomatic_send_handler' );

function aiomatic_send_handler() {
    // Require authentication
    if ( ! is_user_logged_in() ) {
        wp_send_json_error( 'Authentication required', 401 );
        wp_die();
    }

    // Capability check - restrict to trusted roles
    if ( ! current_user_can( 'manage_options' ) ) {
        wp_send_json_error( 'Insufficient privileges', 403 );
        wp_die();
    }

    // Nonce check
    if ( ! isset( $_POST['aiomatic_nonce'] ) || ! wp_verify_nonce( $_POST['aiomatic_nonce'], 'aiomatic_send_action' ) ) {
        wp_send_json_error( 'Invalid nonce', 403 );
        wp_die();
    }

    // Input validation
    $to = isset( $_POST['to'] ) ? sanitize_email( wp_unslash( $_POST['to'] ) ) : '';
    if ( ! is_email( $to ) ) {
        wp_send_json_error( 'Invalid recipient', 400 );
        wp_die();
    }

    // Server-side rate limiting and logging should be applied here
    // Use wp_mail() or a transactional provider to send mail
}
?>

Note: This is conceptual. Implement logging, rate limiting and strict validation according to your architecture and threat model.

Questions fréquemment posées (FAQ)

My site sent spam — do I need to take the site offline?

Not always. If you can disable the vulnerable plugin and apply blocking rules quickly, you may control the behaviour without full downtime. If outbound volume is high or you detect deeper persistence, consider temporarily taking the site offline until cleanup is complete.

Will updating the plugin be sufficient?

Updating to the fixed release is the primary remediation. However, you must also investigate whether the site was already exploited and whether attackers installed backdoors or persistence mechanisms. Run thorough scans and review logs.

Can I rely on SMTP provider protections?

Some SMTP providers throttle or block suspicious activity, but you should not rely on them as the sole mitigation. Preventing exploitation at the web/application layer stops malicious requests from triggering sends in the first place.

Should I disable email features site‑wide?

Temporarily disabling email-sending plugins or restricting outgoing mail is a reasonable short-term mitigation. Long-term, apply tight access controls and use dedicated transactional providers for bulk or critical mail.

Si un site est compromis, effectuez une réponse à l'incident : isolez, supprimez les portes dérobées, faites tourner les identifiants et appliquez un durcissement avant de relancer.

1. Inventory: locate all installations running the affected plugin version (≤ 2.0.5).
2. Update: upgrade to the fixed version (2.0.6 or later) as soon as possible.
3. If immediate update is not possible: deactivate the plugin or apply WAF rules to block email-sending endpoints and parameters.
4. Harden: enforce strong admin passwords, enable 2FA, rotate SMTP credentials and API keys, review file integrity and scheduled tasks.
5. Scan: run malware scans and review logs for suspicious requests and mail activity.
6. Clean up: remove malicious files/backdoors or restore from a known-clean backup.
7. Re-enable carefully: after remediation and validation, re-enable the plugin and monitor closely for anomalies.
8. Post-incident: notify stakeholders and recipients as appropriate and pursue blacklist removals after confirming cleanup.

Long‑term defences and operational best practices

• Keep WordPress core, themes and plugins updated. Use staged testing before rolling changes to production.
• Maintain an asset inventory so you know where each plugin is installed across your estate.
• Use a WAF or reverse proxy with virtual patching capability to block exploit attempts until upstream fixes are applied.
• Move bulk/transactional email to dedicated providers with strict API controls and reputation management.
• Monitor outgoing mail and create alerts for anomalous volumes or templates.
• Conduct periodic security audits and code reviews for plugins that interact with users or send emails.
• Maintain tested backups and an incident response plan tailored to your environment.

Incident response checklist — immediate actions if you discover exploitation

• Isolate the site: enable maintenance mode or take the site offline if needed to stop further abuse.
• Export and preserve logs: save access, error, PHP and mail logs for investigation.
• Change admin passwords and rotate API keys and SMTP credentials.
• Deactivate the vulnerable plugin and apply webserver/WAF block rules.
• Scan the site and remove malicious artifacts; restore from clean backup if required.
• Review email logs and notify recipients/partners where appropriate.
• If blacklisted, follow delisting procedures after confirming remediation.
• Document timeline and scope for postmortem and future prevention.

Final thoughts — act now, then harden

Broken access control in a plugin that can send email is a high-risk combination. Immediate actions are straightforward: update the plugin to the fixed release or disable it until you can, and apply blocking rules at the application or WAF layer to stop unauthenticated requests to email-sending endpoints. After containment, investigate for persistence, clean up, and apply the secure development practices outlined above.

Restez vigilant — Expert en sécurité de Hong Kong