| Plugin Name | wpForo Forum Plugin |
|---|---|
| Type of Vulnerability | SQL Injection |
| CVE Number | CVE-2025-13126 |
| Urgency | High |
| CVE Publish Date | 2025-12-16 |
| Source URL | CVE-2025-13126 |
Urgent Security Advisory: Unauthenticated SQL Injection in wpForo (≤ 2.4.12) — Risks, Detection, and Hardening Guidance
Published: 2025-12-16 | Author: Hong Kong Security Expert
An unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability (CVE-2025-13126) affects the wpForo Forum plugin (≤ 2.4.12). CVSS 9.3 — remote, unauthenticated attackers can interact with your WordPress database. Fixed in wpForo 2.4.13. If you operate production sites with vulnerable versions, treat this as high priority: apply the patch immediately or implement virtual patching and perform a compromise check.
Why this matters (short, direct)
An unauthenticated SQL injection means an attacker needs no WordPress account. This is a remote, unauthenticated, high-impact flaw: attackers can read, modify or delete database contents — user credentials, posts, private messages, site options and other sensitive data. On WordPress installations, SQL injection often leads quickly to full compromise because attackers combine DB access with file upload/backdoor deployment and privilege escalation.
Technical overview of the vulnerability (what an attacker can do)
- Affected software: wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress
- Vulnerable versions: ≤ 2.4.12
- Fixed in: 2.4.13
- CVE: CVE-2025-13126
- Privilege required: none (unauthenticated)
- Impact: sensitive data disclosure, DB modification, potential site compromise
- CVSS: 9.3 (High)
Typical exploitation path:
- Untrusted input is sent via HTTP (GET/POST or AJAX/REST).
- The plugin builds an SQL query concatenating that input without prepared statements or proper escaping.
- An attacker injects SQL meta-characters (quotes, UNION SELECT, comments) to alter query logic and read or modify data.
- With DB reads/writes, attackers can extract credentials, create admin users, add malicious options to wp_options, or inject content and hidden pages.
Illustrative payload examples (do not run on production):
param=1 UNION SELECT user_login, user_pass FROM wp_users--
param=' OR (SELECT 1 FROM (SELECT COUNT(*),CONCAT((SELECT user_login FROM wp_users LIMIT 1),FLOOR(RAND(0)*2))x FROM information_schema.tables GROUP BY x)a)--
param=' OR IF((SELECT LENGTH(user_pass) FROM wp_users LIMIT 1) > 0, SLEEP(5), 0)--
Key point: any unsafely constructed SQL query that includes unvalidated parameters can be coerced into executing attacker SQL.
Immediate mitigation checklist (what to do right now)
If you operate WordPress sites using wpForo (≤ 2.4.12):
-
Patch immediately.
Update wpForo to version 2.4.13 or later — the definitive fix.
-
If you cannot update immediately, apply virtual patching (temporary WAF rules).
- Block/inspect requests to known wpForo endpoints that accept parameters.
- Block requests containing common SQLi payload signatures for the plugin fields (see example rules below).
- Rate-limit and block repeated unauthenticated requests to the same endpoint.
-
Isolate and investigate.
Put the site into maintenance mode or restrict access if you suspect exploitation. Preserve server logs (web server, PHP) — don’t overwrite them.
- Check for compromise. See detection & forensic section below.
-
Rotate credentials and secrets.
If successful attack evidence exists, rotate DB credentials and any keys/secrets. Force password resets for admin users and consider resetting all user sessions.
-
Restore from clean backups if compromise is confirmed.
Use pre-compromise backups only. Do not restore backups that might contain injected content or backdoors.
Suggested WAF rules (virtual patching examples)
Below are sample rules you can deploy on a WAF (ModSecurity-style or similar) to mitigate common SQLi payloads targeting plugin entry points until you update the plugin. Adapt and test in staging first.
ModSecurity (example)
# Block requests to wpForo plugin endpoints
SecRule REQUEST_URI "@contains /wp-content/plugins/wpforo/" "phase:1,deny,log,status:403,msg:'Block suspicious request to wpForo plugin endpoint'"
# Detect UNION SELECT or SELECT ... FROM patterns in parameters for wpForo URLs
SecRule REQUEST_URI "@contains /wp-content/plugins/wpforo/" "phase:2,chain,deny,log,status:403,msg:'SQLi attempt in wpForo param (UNION/SELECT)'"
SecRule ARGS|ARGS_NAMES|REQUEST_HEADERS "(?i:(union\s+select|select\s+.+\s+from|information_schema|sleep\(|benchmark\())" "t:none"
NGINX (location deny)
# Deny direct access to plugin include files (if safe for your site)
location ~* /wp-content/plugins/wpforo/(.*\.php)$ {
deny all;
return 403;
}
Apache .htaccess (block specific request patterns)
<IfModule mod_rewrite.c>
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/wp-content/plugins/wpforo/ [NC]
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} (?:union|select|information_schema|sleep\() [NC]
RewriteRule .* - [F]
</IfModule>
Application-layer signature (pseudo):
- Block requests where the URI contains /wpforo/ AND any parameter contains SQL meta-characters like “UNION SELECT”, “information_schema”, “‘ OR 1=1”, “sleep(” or comment tokens “–” or “/*”.
Important: WAF rules must be tuned to minimise false positives. Start with blocking high-confidence strings and monitoring before stricter enforcement.
How to detect whether you were targeted or compromised
Attackers scan and exploit at scale. Detection requires combining log analysis, DB inspection and filesystem checks.
Web access logs
- Look for high volumes of requests to wpForo paths (/wp-content/plugins/wpforo/, /?wpforo_action=…, or REST/AJAX endpoints).
- Search for SQL-like payloads in query strings or POST bodies: “union select”, “information_schema”, “sleep(“, “benchmark(“, “‘ OR ‘1’=’1′”.
- Requests with unusual user-agents or rapid-fire requests from same IPs.
PHP and application logs
- PHP warnings/errors showing DB errors (MySQL syntax errors) on plugin endpoints.
- Repeated DB errors clustered in short windows — evidence of probe/exploit attempts.
MySQL/DB logs
- If general query logging or slow logging is enabled, search for queries with “UNION”, “information_schema”, or heavy CPU.
- Look for unexpected modifications to wp_users, wp_options, wp_posts (new admin rows, injected options, unusual post content).
WordPress indicators
- New administrator users you did not create.
- Modified wp_options entries that load remote/injected code.
- Unknown PHP files in wp-content/uploads, plugins or themes.
- Unusual scheduled tasks in WP-Cron or wp_options.
- Files with recent modification timestamps — use find to list modified files.
Useful commands
List recently modified files (server shell):
find /var/www/html -type f -mtime -7 -ls
Find administrator users via WP-CLI (if available):
wp user list --role=administrator --format=csv
Search uploads for PHP files:
find wp-content/uploads -type f -name '*.php' -ls
Forensic & incident response steps (if you find indicators)
-
Preserve evidence.
Copy webserver access logs, PHP error logs and database dumps for the relevant time window. Snapshot the filesystem if possible before making changes.
-
Identify scope.
Determine which sites or subdomains used the vulnerable plugin/version. Check other sites on the same hosting account for lateral movement.
-
Contain.
Apply virtual patching (WAF rules) and restrict web access to admin areas. Temporarily deactivate wpForo or take the site offline if active exploitation is suspected.
-
Remove persistence.
Remove rogue admin users, malicious files, suspicious scheduled tasks, and unauthorized plugins/themes. Search for web shells/backdoors (obfuscated PHP, eval(), base64_decode, long random filenames).
-
Remediate.
Update wpForo to 2.4.13 (or latest). Update WordPress core, themes and other plugins. Rotate DB credentials in wp-config.php and on the DB server. Rotate WordPress salts/keys. Force password resets for privileged users.
-
Recovery.
If you have a clean backup from before the compromise, restore and reapply updates. Monitor after recovery for suspicious activity.
-
Post-incident review.
Create a timeline, identify root cause (e.g., unpatched plugin), and document actions. Improve patching and monitoring processes.
Hardening: reduce the blast radius of future vulnerabilities
- Minimise attack surface. Remove unused plugins. Keep only what you actively need.
- Fail-closed WAF and virtual patching. Use application-layer WAF rules that block malicious payload patterns and limit anonymous access to plugin endpoints.
- Principle of least privilege for DB user. Limit the WordPress DB user to necessary privileges. Avoid granting FILE or SUPER where not needed.
- Strong credential hygiene. Enforce strong admin passwords and two-factor authentication for elevated accounts. Rotate secrets and WP salts periodically.
- Integrity monitoring. Monitor filesystem changes and establish file integrity checks. Alert on newly added .php files in uploads or unexpected changes to plugin/theme files.
- Patch management. Maintain a policy for plugin updates. Test upgrades in staging and have rollback plans.
- Backups and disaster recovery. Keep automated, encrypted offsite backups and test restoration procedures regularly.
- Logging and monitoring. Forward webserver logs to a central store for long-term analysis and enable anomaly detection.
Sample detection queries and WP-CLI commands
# Find users added in the last 30 days
wp user list --role=administrator --format=json | jq '.[] | select(.registered | fromdateiso8601 > (now - 2592000))'
# Search database for suspicious options
SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_value LIKE '%base64%' OR option_value LIKE '%eval(%' OR option_value LIKE '%http%';
# Scan for PHP webshell indicators
grep -R --binary-files=without-match -nE "(base64_decode|eval\(|gzinflate|str_rot13|preg_replace\(.*/e" /var/www/html/wp-content
Example WAF signature strategy (conceptual)
- High-confidence blocks: Requests to known vulnerable endpoints that contain “UNION SELECT”, “information_schema”, “sleep(“, “benchmark(“, or SQL comments “–“.
- Medium-confidence monitoring: Unauthenticated requests with single quotes or OR/AND sequences to plugin AJAX endpoints.
- Low-confidence (log only): Requests with obfuscated payloads or encoded characters that may indicate obfuscation or exfiltration attempts.
Tune rules to your traffic. Start with blocking high-confidence strings and ramp up after validating false positive rates.
Common false positives and rule tuning tips
- Legitimate content (code snippets, search terms) may include keywords like “select” or “union”. Avoid naive pattern matches that block valid traffic.
- Normalise encoding: attacks may URL-encode quotes or other characters. Rules should inspect decoded payloads.
- Use request context (endpoint + method + auth state) to increase confidence. Example: block unauthenticated POSTs with SQL keywords to wpForo endpoints but allow authenticated admin traffic.
Real-world attack scenarios — what to watch for
- User data exfiltration. Attackers retrieve password hashes and emails for offline cracking or reuse.
- Silent backdoor persistence. Attackers create admin users and install minimal backdoors that connect to a C2 or download payloads.
- Defacement and SEO spam. Injected spammy posts or hidden pages harm SEO and trust.
- Ransom or extortion. Stolen user data or site control can lead to extortion demands.
Long-term prevention program
- Implement a security lifecycle: identify → prioritise → patch/mitigate → validate → monitor.
- Maintain an inventory of all plugins and versions per site. Prioritise hotfixes for publicly known exploits.
- Test upgrades in staging and maintain rollback plans.
- Keep a virtual patching capability to deploy quick mitigations when zero-days are announced.
FAQ
Q: I updated to 2.4.13 — do I still need to run checks?
A: Yes. Updating removes the vulnerability going forward, but check logs and the DB for evidence of prior exploitation (new admin users, modified options, unusual files). If you find evidence, follow the incident response steps above.
Q: My site has custom code that interacts with wpForo. Could WAF rules break legitimate functionality?
A: Potentially. Deploy WAF rules in monitor/log mode first, validate, then move to block for high-confidence indicators. If you rely on specific plugin endpoints, whitelist known good parameters or authenticated traffic.
Q: I run multiple sites on the same server. Are they all at risk?
A: Yes, if they host the same vulnerable plugin version. If one site is compromised, attackers may attempt lateral movement within the same hosting environment.
Final recommendations and checklist (summary)
- Immediate: Update wpForo to 2.4.13 or higher. If you cannot, put WAF rules in front of the site to block SQLi patterns.
- Investigate: Search logs and DB for injected queries, new admin users, suspicious options and files.
- Harden: Apply least privilege for DB users, enable two-factor authentication, keep regular backups, and remove unused plugins.
- Monitor: Keep long-term logs and watch for anomalous traffic to plugin endpoints.
- Recover: If compromised, preserve evidence, remove persistence, rotate credentials, and restore from clean backups.
If you need tailored help for a specific site or multiple sites, engage a trusted security professional to assist with detection, virtual patching, containment and recovery.