| Plugin Name | YourMembership Single Sign On |
|---|---|
| Type of Vulnerability | Unauthenticated Data Exposure |
| CVE Number | CVE-2025-10648 |
| Urgency | Low |
| CVE Publish Date | 2025-10-15 |
| Source URL | CVE-2025-10648 |
Urgent: YourMembership SSO plugin (≤ 1.1.7) — Missing authorization leads to sensitive-data exposure (CVE-2025-10648)
Date: October 2025
Technical advisory from a Hong Kong security expert — clear, practical, and prioritised for operators and developers.
Short summary
A broken access control issue (CVE-2025-10648) was disclosed in the YourMembership Single Sign On for WordPress plugin (YM SSO) affecting versions ≤ 1.1.7. The vulnerability is rooted in a function named moym_display_test_attributes that can be triggered without proper authorization checks. An unauthenticated remote actor may be able to call functionality that exposes sensitive information depending on how that function is implemented and what it outputs on the affected site.
This advisory explains the risk, detection methods, and step‑by‑step mitigations: server-level rules, WordPress-level emergency blocks, developer remediation guidance, log detection, and long-term hardening. While waiting for an official plugin fix, apply conservative mitigations to reduce exposure.
Table of contents
- Why this matters (threat model)
- Technical overview of the vulnerability
- Impact scenarios and risk assessment (CVSS context)
- Immediate actions for site owners (high priority)
- Recommended WAF rules and server blocks (examples)
- Developer remediation: secure coding fixes
- How to detect exploitation attempts in logs
- Best practices to reduce future risk
- Checklist: What to do now
- Final notes
Why this matters (threat model)
Broken access control flaws are common and dangerous in WordPress plugins because they allow unauthenticated or low‑privileged actors to access data or functionality that should be restricted. Typical sensitive outputs include:
- Internal debug output, API keys, or tokens
- User data or internal configuration values
- Any data returned by a plugin callback intended only for admins or internal use
When a public site exposes a test or debug function, it becomes an easy target for scanners and automated attackers. The CVSS for this issue is 5.3 (medium), but context matters: if the plugin contains or accesses member PII, payment integrations, or SSO credentials, the practical risk is higher.
Technical overview of the vulnerability
- A function named
moym_display_test_attributesis exposed and can be invoked without proper capability checks. - The function appears to be intended for testing or internal use and may return internal attributes, debug variables, or configuration values.
- Exposed outputs can include sensitive values depending on environment and configuration.
- Affected plugin versions: ≤ 1.1.7.
- CVE: CVE-2025-10648.
Exploit details are intentionally omitted here. This advisory focuses on defensive signatures, detection, and secure fixes.
Impact scenarios and risk assessment
Possible direct impacts
- Leakage of configuration or debugging information (tokens, API endpoints).
- Disclosure of internal values that enable follow-up attacks.
- Facilitation of chained attacks when combined with other weaknesses (e.g., credential reuse, misconfiguration).
Contextual risk factors
- Does the site contain member PII (names, emails, subscription data)? If yes, treat disclosure as more serious.
- Is the plugin integrated with external services (payment gateways, CRM) where API keys may be present?
- Is the plugin active across many sites you operate? Prioritise patching or mitigations accordingly.
CVSS explanation (5.3)
A CVSS of 5.3 reflects a moderate information disclosure accessible without authentication. While it does not directly enable remote code execution, leaked data often speeds attacker reconnaissance and enables follow‑on compromises.
Immediate actions for site owners (what to do right now)
If you run WordPress sites using the YourMembership Single Sign On plugin:
- Identify affected sites — Check plugin lists and note versions. Versions ≤ 1.1.7 are vulnerable.
- Update if available — Apply an official vendor patch immediately if released.
- If no update is available, consider disabling the plugin — Deactivate on public sites if feasible. If deactivation would break production authentication, apply mitigations below.
- Harden access to the exposed functionality — Block or restrict requests that reference
moym_display_test_attributes. - Monitor logs — Search access logs for invocations of the function or unusual parameters.
- Engage incident response if needed — If you suspect data was exposed, isolate the site, preserve logs, and follow your incident response processes.
Recommended WAF rules and server blocks (concrete examples)
Below are conservative defensive patterns for ModSecurity, NGINX, Apache, and WordPress-level blocking. Test rules in staging before production deployment.
ModSecurity rule (example)
SecRule REQUEST_URI|ARGS "@rx moym_display_test_attributes"
"id:1001001,phase:1,deny,log,status:403,msg:'Blocked attempt to call moym_display_test_attributes'"
NGINX location/block example
if ($request_uri ~* "moym_display_test_attributes") {
return 403;
}
if ($arg_moym_display_test_attributes) {
return 403;
}
Apache .htaccess block
<IfModule mod_rewrite.c>
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} moym_display_test_attributes [NC,OR]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} moym_display_test_attributes [NC]
RewriteRule .* - [F]
</IfModule>
WordPress-level simple block (MU plugin or theme functions.php)
Add as a must-use plugin or a short MU plugin to deny requests containing the test string in URI or query string:
add_action('init', function() {
$needle = 'moym_display_test_attributes';
$uri = isset($_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']) ? $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] : '';
$qs = isset($_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']) ? $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING'] : '';
if (stripos($uri, $needle) !== false || stripos($qs, $needle) !== false) {
status_header(403);
exit;
}
}, 0);
Note: these are emergency mitigations. The long‑term fix is a patch in the plugin source that enforces proper permission checks and removes test-only endpoints.
Developer remediation: how to fix the plugin securely
If you maintain or develop the plugin, the correct steps are:
- Remove or disable test code — Do not ship test/debug endpoints in production releases.
- Implement capability checks — Use explicit checks such as
current_user_can('manage_options')for admin-level functions. - Use proper REST permission callbacks — For WP REST API routes, register with a
permission_callbackthat enforces a narrow capability. - Require nonces for AJAX actions — Use
check_ajax_referer()for admin-ajax endpoints. - Sanitise and limit output — Do not print internal variables; escape output with
esc_html(),esc_attr(), orwp_json_encode(). - Log and monitor — Return minimal error messages and log full details for admin review.
- Release checklist — Include tests to ensure debug endpoints are removed before release.
Suggested patch pattern (conceptual):
function moym_display_test_attributes() {
if ( ! is_user_logged_in() || ! current_user_can( 'manage_options' ) ) {
wp_send_json_error( 'Unauthorized', 403 );
}
$output = array(
'status' => 'ok',
// Return only non-sensitive, sanitized information
);
wp_send_json_success( $output );
}
How to detect exploitation attempts in logs
Search webserver and application logs for attempts to call the function or access private endpoints. Look for:
- Requests containing
moym_display_test_attributesin REQUEST_URI, query string, or POST body - Mass scanning patterns: repeated requests from the same IP across many sites
- Suspicious user agents or absent user agents
- Unexpected 200 responses from endpoints that should require authentication
Example grep commands:
# Apache/Nginx access logs
grep -i "moym_display_test_attributes" /var/log/nginx/access.log
# PHP / WordPress logs
grep -i "moym_display_test_attributes" /var/log/php_errors.log
If you find hits, collect timestamp, source IP, user agent, and full request. Temporarily block offending IPs while investigating. If sensitive information appears to have been returned, escalate per your incident response procedures and consider notifying affected users.
Best practices to reduce future risk
- Keep an inventory of plugins and versions across all sites you manage.
- Use staging environments and release controls to prevent shipping debug code to production.
- Apply the principle of least privilege: restrict capabilities required for plugin functions.
- Use short-term virtual patching at the edge or server while awaiting vendor fixes, but treat it as temporary.
- Continuously monitor logs and run regular security scans.
- Follow secure coding guidelines: nonces, capability checks, REST permission callbacks, and output escaping.
Checklist: What to do now (step‑by‑step)
- Inventory: Identify all sites using the YourMembership SSO plugin and confirm version numbers.
- Patch: Update plugin if an official fixed version is available.
- Disable: If no patch and the plugin isn’t essential, deactivate it.
- Mitigate: Apply server/WAF/WordPress blocking rules shown above.
- Monitor: Search logs for
moym_display_test_attributesoccurrences. - Block: Temporarily block suspicious source IPs and investigate.
- Scan: Run a full malware and integrity scan if you suspect compromise.
- Backup: Create a known-good backup after cleaning and keep logs for analysis.
- Harden: Ensure role/capability checks and remove debug endpoints from codebases.
- Consult: If you cannot remediate in-house, engage a trusted security professional or your hosting provider for assistance.
Example incident scenario (how attackers may use this)
An attacker scans the web for sites running the vulnerable plugin, invokes the exposed endpoint, and retrieves internal attribute values (for example, configuration flags or endpoint URLs). That information is used to craft targeted follow-up attacks such as credential harvesting, phishing, or probing other endpoints. Closing the information disclosure significantly reduces the risk of chained attacks.
Final notes
Broken access control often stems from development conveniences left in production. The primary responsibility for fixing the plugin lies with its author, but site owners and operators must act quickly: inventory, monitor, and apply mitigations. Where appropriate, apply server-level or WAF rules to limit exposure while waiting for an official fix.
If you need hands-on assistance, engage a reputable security consultant or contact your hosting provider. Preserve logs and evidence if you suspect compromise, and follow your organisation’s incident response process.
Stay vigilant and treat unexpected public endpoints as high-priority triage items.
— Hong Kong Security Expert